These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8456785)

  • 1. A tensor analysis to evaluate the effect of high-pull headgear on Class II malocclusions.
    Ngan P; Scheick J; Florman M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 8456785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Firouz M; Zernik J; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 1510043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Lall R; Kumar GA; Maheshwari A; Kumar M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study.
    Pancherz H; Anehus-Pancherz M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):510-20. PubMed ID: 8506812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of an anterior biteplate on dental and skeletal Class II correction using headgears: a cephalometric study.
    Thurman MM; King GJ; Ramsay DS; Wheeler TT; Phillips C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 22008301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal, dental, and functional effects of headgear-activator therapy on Class II malocclusion in Japanese: a clinical case report.
    Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Sep; 100(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 1877554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study.
    Ulusoy C; Darendeliler N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):490.e9-15. PubMed ID: 18405811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The cervical headgear action in the mixed dentition on maxilla, mandible and teeth in class II, division 1, malocclusions--a cephalometric study (author's transl)].
    Henriques JF; Martins DR; Pinzan A
    Ortodontia; 1979; 12(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 397458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.