These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. Turgeon C; Lazzouni L; Lepore F; Ellemberg D Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mismatch negativity brain response as an index of speech perception recovery in cochlear-implant recipients. Lonka E; Kujala T; Lehtokoski A; Johansson R; Rimmanen S; Alho K; Näätänen R Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 15084820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term auditory processing outcomes in early implanted young adults with cochlear implants: The mismatch negativity vs. P300 response. Abrahamse R; Beynon A; Piai V Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Jan; 132(1):258-268. PubMed ID: 33139199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users. Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Don M; Waring MD; Kwong B; Cunningham J; Trautwein P Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):167-85. PubMed ID: 10859411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users. Prévost F; Lehmann A Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users. Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the clinical relevance of mismatch negativity: results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users. Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 9390795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Sharma A; Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell T; Nicol T Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 7681392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ponton CW; Don M Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):131-46. PubMed ID: 7774766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners. Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different. Kraus N; McGee T; Micco A; Sharma A; Carrell T; Nicol T Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7681753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background. Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]