245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8460218)
1. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast.
Harms SE; Flamig DP; Hesley KL; Evans WP; Cheek JH; Peters GN; Knox SM; Savino DA; Netto GJ; Wells RB
Radiographics; 1993 Mar; 13(2):247-67. PubMed ID: 8460218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation.
Harms SE; Flamig DP; Hesley KL; Meiches MD; Jensen RA; Evans WP; Savino DA; Wells RV
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):493-501. PubMed ID: 8475297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using fat-suppressed dynamic MR imaging].
Koshiishi T; Isomoto I; Nakamura K; Kajiwara Y; Izawa K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jul; 58(8):433-40. PubMed ID: 9745257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human female breast. Current status and pathologic correlations.
Powell DE; Stelling CB
Pathol Annu; 1988; 23 Pt 1():159-94. PubMed ID: 2838793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.
Boetes C; Mus RD; Holland R; Barentsz JO; Strijk SP; Wobbes T; Hendriks JH; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 7480749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Fobben ES; Rubin CZ; Kalisher L; Dembner AG; Seltzer MH; Santoro EJ
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 7784558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast. Work in progress.
Pierce WB; Harms SE; Flamig DP; Griffey RH; Evans WP; Hagans JE
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 1947093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram.
Lee CH; Smith RC; Levine JA; Troiano RN; Tocino I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 10541112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy.
Orel SG; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Fraker DL; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 9356624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The specificity of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Piccoli CW
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):557-71. PubMed ID: 7489308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 12876038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection with MR imaging of residual tumor in the breast soon after surgery.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Farrell RS; Pruneda JM; Flamig DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):485-8. PubMed ID: 9016232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
