These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8461066)

  • 1. Conflict of interest.
    Müller A
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6409):199. PubMed ID: 8461066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical issues related to publishing and reviewing.
    Morgan GA; Harmon RJ; Gliner JA
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2001 Dec; 40(12):1476-8. PubMed ID: 11765295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Next steps in the Schön affair.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fostering integrity in scientific research and publishing.
    Burton GA; Wenning RJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):560-561. PubMed ID: 28613026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
    Kuzma SM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity.
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error, ignorance and fraud.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1990 Dec; 143(12):1295. PubMed ID: 2253137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publish or perish. The debate from a global perspective.
    Jones R
    Aust Fam Physician; 1999 May; 28(5):425-6. PubMed ID: 10376362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct.
    Klotz LH
    Can J Urol; 2001 Dec; 8(6):1392. PubMed ID: 11788015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More questions about research misconduct.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):13. PubMed ID: 12098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical conduct of journal editors.
    Young SN; Joffe RT
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 29(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 15486604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective.
    Sellke FW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1683-5. PubMed ID: 14688671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
    Youngs R; Kenyon G
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Writing and publishing health sciences research: ethical considerations and experiences from EAMJ.
    Lore W
    East Afr Med J; 1999 Dec; 76(12):659-60. PubMed ID: 10734532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Declaration of financial interests.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2001 Oct; 3(10):E219-20. PubMed ID: 11584279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.