These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity. New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Error, ignorance and fraud. Squires BP CMAJ; 1990 Dec; 143(12):1295. PubMed ID: 2253137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Publish or perish. The debate from a global perspective. Jones R Aust Fam Physician; 1999 May; 28(5):425-6. PubMed ID: 10376362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective. Sellke FW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1683-5. PubMed ID: 14688671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing. Youngs R; Kenyon G J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Writing and publishing health sciences research: ethical considerations and experiences from EAMJ. Lore W East Afr Med J; 1999 Dec; 76(12):659-60. PubMed ID: 10734532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]