These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8461066)

  • 21. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
    Dayton L
    Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The evaluation of medical research].
    Malacara JM
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 9707997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review.
    Blaivas JG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(7):617. PubMed ID: 15382180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in Medical Education.
    Eva KW
    Med Educ; 2009 Jan; 43(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 19140991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Publisher fraud. The publication of falsified medical research results].
    Diehl V; Schütt I; Walshe R
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 125(38):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11147362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
    England C; Hodgkinson M; Tamber PS
    Natl Med J India; 2007; 20(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 17802982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
    Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Good manners.
    Koehn RK
    Nature; 1995 Nov; 378(6552):10. PubMed ID: 7477273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The promise and perils of peer review.
    Rohrich RJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(3):795-7. PubMed ID: 16932192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical editors to take tougher line.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):11. PubMed ID: 15139349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pay or train to publish?
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6890):673. PubMed ID: 12066139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality of the scientific literature: all that glitters is not gold.
    Diamandis EP
    Clin Biochem; 2006 Dec; 39(12):1109-11. PubMed ID: 17052701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Publication ethics.
    Morton NS
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1011-3. PubMed ID: 19619189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Committee on publication ethics (COPE): guidelines on good publication practice.
    Committee on Publication Ethics
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2000; 12(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 11005683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Standards for papers on cloning.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In whose interest?
    Nichols PS; Winslow GR
    J Am Coll Dent; 2004; 71(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 15559592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
    Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How far do you trust your colleagues?
    Neufeld A
    New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.