These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8462706)

  • 1. Three dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery surgery: a comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Chiesa R; Melissano G; Castellano R; Triulzi F; Anzalone N; Veglia F; Scotti G; Grossi A
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1993 Mar; 7(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 8462706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ito K; Sasaki M; Kobayashi M; Ogasawara K; Nishihara T; Takahashi T; Natori T; Uwano I; Yamashita F; Kudo K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 23(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 24103664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
    Vogl TJ; Kutter RW; Schön K; Juergens M; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Steger W; Felix R
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
    Binaghi S; Maeder P; Uské A; Meuwly JY; Devuyst G; Meuli RA
    Eur Neurol; 2001; 46(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11455180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
    Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
    Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
    Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The significance of MR angiography for the diagnosis of carotid stenoses].
    Michaely HJ; Herrmann KA; Kramer H; Laub G; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    Radiologe; 2004 Oct; 44(10):975-84. PubMed ID: 15549221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography.
    Magarelli N; Scarabino T; Simeone AL; Florio F; Carriero A; Salvolini U; Bonomo L
    Neuroradiology; 1998 Jun; 40(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 9689624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
    Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
    Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
    Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
    Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
    Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.