These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8462886)

  • 1. Correlation of spatial contrast sensitivity and visual fields in glaucoma.
    Zulauf M; Flammer J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Mar; 231(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 8462886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement of visual field indices after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure.
    Gandolfi SA
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1995; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7596538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.
    Iester M; Mermoud A; Schnyder C
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pattern discrimination perimetry in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Nutaitis MJ; Stewart WC; Kelly DM; Hunt HH; Severns ML
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 114(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 1524117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static threshold examination of the peripheral nasal visual field in glaucoma.
    Caprioli J; Spaeth GL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Aug; 103(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 3839665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing distribution and number of test locations in perimetry.
    Sugimoto K; Schötzau A; Bergamin O; Zulauf M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Feb; 236(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 9498120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
    Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
    Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of structure-function relationship between corresponding retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and Octopus visual field cluster defect values determined by normal and tendency-oriented strategies.
    Holló G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 27107030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; Drance SM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 1427134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression.
    Funkhouser A; Flammer J; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner HP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1577286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of the Modified Isolated-check Visual Evoked Potential Technique in Functional Glaucoma Assessment.
    Kolomeyer NN; Drinkwater OJ; Drivas E; Zakik A; Zemon V; Sidoti PA; Tsai JC; Panarelli JF
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Apr; 29(4):258-263. PubMed ID: 31917721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
    Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of Structural and Functional Measures With Contrast Sensitivity in Glaucoma.
    Fatehi N; Nowroozizadeh S; Henry S; Coleman AL; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 178():129-139. PubMed ID: 28342719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.
    Garcia-Medina JJ; Garcia-Medina M; Zanon-Moreno V; Garcia-Maturana C; Cruz-Espinosa FJ; Pinazo-Duran MD
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 250(9):1347-51. PubMed ID: 22270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal contrast sensitivity loss in primary open-angle glaucoma and glaucoma suspects.
    Breton ME; Wilson TW; Wilson R; Spaeth GL; Krupin T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Oct; 32(11):2931-41. PubMed ID: 1917396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Structural and Functional Measures?
    Schrems WA; Schrems-Hoesl LM; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Kruse FE; Horn FK
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Apr; 26(4):373-382. PubMed ID: 28118204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice.
    Graham SL; Klistorner AI; Goldberg I
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 123(6):729-39. PubMed ID: 15955974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.