These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8463146)

  • 1. Effects of selection strategies using heifer pelvic area and sire birth weight expected progeny difference on dystocia in first-calf heifers.
    Cook BR; Tess MW; Kress DD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 8463146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing calving difficulty in beef heifers.
    Naazie A; Makarechian MM; Berg RT
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3243-9. PubMed ID: 2613572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers.
    Colburn DJ; Deutscher GH; Nielsen MK; Adams DC
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1452-60. PubMed ID: 9250504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dystocia in 3-year-old beef heifers; relationship to maternal nutrient intake during early- and mid-gestation, pelvic area and hormonal indicators of placental function.
    Micke GC; Sullivan TM; Rolls PJ; Hasell B; Greer RM; Norman ST; Perry VE
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Apr; 118(2-4):163-70. PubMed ID: 19762178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discriminant analysis for predicting dystocia in beef cattle. I. Comparison with regression analysis.
    Morrison DG; Humes PE; Keith NK; Godke RA
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):608-16. PubMed ID: 3988637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting dystocia in Brahman-cross heifers in subtropical southeastern United States.
    Bellows RA; Genho PC; Moore SA; Chase CC
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Jul; 74(7):1451-6. PubMed ID: 8818787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficacy of predicting dystocia in yearling beef heifers: I. Using ratios of pelvic area to birth weight or pelvic area to heifer weight.
    Basarab JA; Rutter LM; Day PA
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1359-71. PubMed ID: 8325795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. II. Phenotypic differences.
    Bennett GL; Thallman RM; Snelling WM; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2103-14. PubMed ID: 18441079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy of predicting dystocia in yearling beef heifers: II. Using discriminant analysis.
    Basarab JA; Rutter LM; Day PA
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1372-80. PubMed ID: 8325796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dystocia in beef heifers: a review of genetic and nutritional influences.
    Hickson RE; Morris ST; Kenyon PR; Lopez-Villalobos N
    N Z Vet J; 2006 Dec; 54(6):256-64. PubMed ID: 17151722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body measurements of crossbred calves sired by Simmental bulls divergently selected for progeny first-calf calving ease in relation to birth weight.
    Nugent RA; Notter DR
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jun; 69(6):2422-33. PubMed ID: 1885360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic, phenotypic, and environmental parameter estimates of calving difficulty, weight, and measures of pelvic size in beef heifers.
    Naazie A; Makarechian M; Berg RT
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4793-800. PubMed ID: 1808175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beef x beef and dairy x beef females mated to Angus and Charolais sires. I. Pregnancy rate, dystocia and birth weight.
    Nelson LA; Beavers GD
    J Anim Sci; 1982 Jun; 54(6):1138-49. PubMed ID: 7107532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic (co)variances for calving difficulty score in composite and parental populations of beef cattle: II. Reproductive, skeletal, and carcass traits.
    Bennett GL; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11204715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body measurements of newborn calves and relationship of calf shape to sire breeding values for birth weight and calving ease.
    Nugent RA; Notter DR; Beal WE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jun; 69(6):2413-21. PubMed ID: 1885359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Synovex C implants on growth rate, pelvic area, reproduction, and calving performance of replacement heifers.
    Hancock RF; Deutscher GH; Nielsen MK; Colburn DJ
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Feb; 72(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 8157513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of stillbirth and dystocia in Ontario cow-calf herds.
    McDermott JJ; Allen OB; Martin SW; Alves DM
    Can J Vet Res; 1992 Jan; 56(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 1586893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential response from selection for high calving ease vs. low birth weight in American Simmental beef cattle.
    Saad HM; Thomas MG; Speidel SE; Peel RK; Frasier WM; Enns RM
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jul; 98(7):. PubMed ID: 32609315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical utility of calf front hoof circumference and maternal intrapelvic area in predicting dystocia in 103 late gestation Holstein-Friesian heifers and cows.
    Hiew MW; Megahed AA; Townsend JR; Singleton WL; Constable PD
    Theriogenology; 2016 Feb; 85(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 26474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.