BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8463388)

  • 1. Comparison of the BacT/Alert pediatric blood culture system, Pedi-BacT, with conventional culture using the 20-milliliter Becton-Dickinson supplemented peptone broth tube.
    Krisher KK; Whyburn DR; Koepnick FE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):793-7. PubMed ID: 8463388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the BacT/Alert PF pediatric FAN blood culture bottle with the standard pediatric blood culture bottle, the Pedi-BacT.
    Krisher KK; Gibb P; Corbett S; Church D
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Aug; 39(8):2880-3. PubMed ID: 11474007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.
    Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the automated Bact-Alert system for pediatric blood culturing.
    Pickett DA; Welch DF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 103(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 7872254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system.
    Rohner P; Pepey B; Auckenthaler R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 7714185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital.
    Smith JA; Bryce EA; Ngui-Yen JH; Roberts FJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Jul; 33(7):1905-8. PubMed ID: 7665668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.
    Ziegler R; Johnscher I; Martus P; Lenhardt D; Just HM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood.
    Mirrett S; Reller LB; Petti CA; Woods CW; Vazirani B; Sivadas R; Weinstein MP
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jun; 41(6):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12791854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systems.
    Hellinger WC; Cawley JJ; Alvarez S; Hogan SF; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup DM; Cockerill FR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Jul; 33(7):1787-90. PubMed ID: 7665647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia.
    Doern GV; Barton A; Rao S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 36(9):2686-9. PubMed ID: 9705414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of BacT/Alert and BACTEC NR 860 blood culture systems in a laboratory not continuously staffed.
    Riest G; Linde HJ; Shah PM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 1997 Jun; 3(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 11864131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.
    Flayhart D; Borek AP; Wakefield T; Dick J; Carroll KC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):816-21. PubMed ID: 17166960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the BacT/Alert and isolator aerobic blood culture systems.
    Engler HD; Fahle GA; Gill VJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 8659454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlled evaluation of 5 versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.
    Weinstein MP; Mirrett S; Wilson ML; Reimer LG; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2103-6. PubMed ID: 7814532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of BACTEC and BacT/ALERT systems in evaluation of blood cultures].
    Ardiç N; Ilga U; Ozyurt M; Haznedaroğlu T
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004 Oct; 38(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 15700666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.
    Fiori B; D'Inzeo T; Di Florio V; De Maio F; De Angelis G; Giaquinto A; Campana L; Tanzarella E; Tumbarello M; Antonelli M; Sanguinetti M; Spanu T
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 52(10):3558-67. PubMed ID: 25031441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.
    Mirrett S; Everts RJ; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2098-101. PubMed ID: 11376041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of negative results of BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system.
    Kocoglu ME; Bayram A; Balci I
    J Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 43(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 15995643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of two commercial blood culture systems.
    Spanjaard L; Kuijper EJ; Dankert J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Nov; 19(11):881-5. PubMed ID: 11152316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of simulated blood cultures for time to detection comparison between BacT/ALERT and BACTEC 9240 blood culture systems.
    Viganò EF; Vasconi E; Agrappi C; Clerici P
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Nov; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 12493169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.