These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8463399)
1. Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. Wilson ML; Davis TE; Mirrett S; Reynolds J; Fuller D; Allen SD; Flint KK; Koontz F; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):865-71. PubMed ID: 8463399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood. Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Jorgensen JH; Mirrett S; McDonald LC; Murray PR; Weinstein MP; Fune J; Trippy CW; Masterson M; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8968880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections. Cockerill FR; Reed GS; Hughes JG; Torgerson CA; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Dale JC; Roberts GD; Ilstrup DM; Henry NK J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 35(6):1469-72. PubMed ID: 9163464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults. Wilson ML; Mirrett S; Meredith FT; Weinstein MP; Scotto V; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):983-9. PubMed ID: 11230415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood. Mirrett S; Reller LB; Petti CA; Woods CW; Vazirani B; Sivadas R; Weinstein MP J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jun; 41(6):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12791854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium. Mirrett S; Petti CA; Woods CW; Magadia R; Weinstein MP; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4581-5. PubMed ID: 15472312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlled comparison of BacT/ALERT FAN aerobic medium and BATEC fungal blood culture medium for detection of fungemia. McDonald LC; Weinstein MP; Fune J; Mirrett S; Reimer LG; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 39(2):622-4. PubMed ID: 11158118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. Doern GV; Barton A; Rao S J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 36(9):2686-9. PubMed ID: 9705414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Mirrett S; Reimer LG; Feldman RJ; Chuard CR; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2265-70. PubMed ID: 7494013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic medium for recovery of mycobacteria, fungi, and bacteria from blood. Fuller DD; Davis TE; Denys GA; York MK J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Aug; 39(8):2933-6. PubMed ID: 11474016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood. Mirrett S; Everts RJ; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2098-101. PubMed ID: 11376041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Isolator 1.5 and BACTEC NR660 aerobic 6A blood culture systems for detection of fungemia in children. Petti CA; Zaidi AK; Mirrett S; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Aug; 34(8):1877-9. PubMed ID: 8818873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections. Ziegler R; Johnscher I; Martus P; Lenhardt D; Just HM J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Weinstein MP; Mirrett S; Reimer LG; Wilson ML; Smith-Elekes S; Chuard CR; Joho KL; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):978-81. PubMed ID: 7790471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of simulated blood cultures for time to detection comparison between BacT/ALERT and BACTEC 9240 blood culture systems. Viganò EF; Vasconi E; Agrappi C; Clerici P Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Nov; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 12493169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections. Pohlman JK; Kirkley BA; Easley KA; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2525-9. PubMed ID: 8567877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]