These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8463752)
1. Maternal-fetal relationship. The courts and social policy. Blank RH J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 8463752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Homologizing pregnancy and motherhood: a consideration of abortion. Hanigsberg JE Mich Law Rev; 1995 Nov; 94(2):371-418. PubMed ID: 10160508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation. Blank RH J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Women and fetus: the social construction of conflict. Chavkin W Women Crim Justice; 1992; 3(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 11656335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Helping women helping children: drug policy and future generations. King PA Milbank Q; 1991; 69(4):595-621. PubMed ID: 1806803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns. Shultz MM South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dobson v. Dobson: tort liability for expectant mothers? Foley T Sask Law Rev; 1998; 61(1):177-98. PubMed ID: 16528855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioethical consideration of maternal-fetal issues. Post LF Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):757-75. PubMed ID: 12455510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women. Annas GJ Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Jennifer Johnson's sentence: commentary on "Birth penalty. Chavkin W J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):140-1. PubMed ID: 11642829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancy and prenatal harm to offspring: the case of mothers with PKU. Robertson JA; Schulman JD Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(4):23-33. PubMed ID: 3667247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ACLU philosophy and the right to abuse the unborn. Johnson PE Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11650911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ethics of in utero fetal surgery. A possible threat to the autonomy of pregnant women? Twomey JG Nurs Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 24(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 2685771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and the compromise of fatherhood. Morabito S Hum Life Rev; 1991; 17(4):83-100. PubMed ID: 11652623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions. Rhoden NK Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy. Steinbock B Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):781-93. PubMed ID: 11652864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]