84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8463887)
21. [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
Picard M; Ilecki HJ; Baxter JD
Audiology; 1988; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hearing screening with portable screening pure-tone audiometer and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Wang YF; Wang SS; Tai CC; Lin LC; Shiao AS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Jun; 65(6):285-92. PubMed ID: 12201570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Computer-assisted audiometry].
Arifov SS; Razhabov FF; Khasanov AA
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2001; (1):30-2. PubMed ID: 11247243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Free voice and pure tone audiometer for routine testing of auditory acuity; studies on comparative efficiency.
HARRIS JD
Arch Otolaryngol (1925); 1946 Oct; 44(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 21002091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Audiometer calibration: two neglected areas.
Smith PA; Foster JR
Br J Audiol; 1997 Oct; 31(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 9373745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of computerized audiometry by Ansi, Bekesy fixed-frequency, and modified ISO procedures in an industrial hearing conservation program.
Harris JD
J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):143-67. PubMed ID: 7345061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
Halloran DR; Hardin JM; Wall TC
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Subjective intraoperative hearing self-assessment in patients after stapedotomy comparing to postoperative pure-tone audiometry].
Jankowski A; Durko T; Pajor A; Durko M
Otolaryngol Pol; 2010; 64(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 21166139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Smartphone-based audiometric test for screening hearing loss in the elderly.
Abu-Ghanem S; Handzel O; Ness L; Ben-Artzi-Blima M; Fait-Ghelbendorf K; Himmelfarb M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 273(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 25655259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The simplified HF E-800 high-frequency audiometer: clinical applications.
Gauz MT; Smith MM; Hinkle RR
J Aud Res; 1986 Apr; 26(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3624194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation of pure tone audiogram results and hearing benefit of tympanoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Yuen AP; Ho WK; Hui Y; Wei WI; Au DK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2000 Apr; 109(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 10778893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing two methods of preschool and kindergarten hearing screening.
Hamill B
J Sch Health; 1988 Mar; 58(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 3352234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Audiometric instrumentation: equipment choices, techniques.
Morrill JC
Occup Health Saf; 1984; 53(10):78-84. PubMed ID: 6549600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Visual reinforcement audiometry: an Adobe Flash based approach.
Atherton S
J Vis Commun Med; 2010 Sep; 33(3):110-2. PubMed ID: 20828255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How we do it: tympanoplasty: are different three- and four-frequency averages comparable?
Dawes PJ; Welch D; Lee P
Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 31(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 16911654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pure tone audiometry: comparison of general practice and hospital services.
Smith MC; Cable HR; Wilmot JF
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Dec; 38(317):552-5. PubMed ID: 3267745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High-frequency Bekesy audiometry: IV. Normative aspects for normal-hearing young adult.
Guaz MT; Allen DV
J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 6677637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
