These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8463965)

  • 81. Evaluation of silicone elastomers as structural materials for microstructured adhesives.
    Simaite A; Spenko M
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2019 May; 14(4):046005. PubMed ID: 31075783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Basoglu T; Yapici O; Yuzbasioglu E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 16473089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The effect of five silane coupling agents on the bond strength of a luting cement to a silica-coated titanium.
    Matinlinna JP; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. TISSUE REACTION TO INTRACORNEAL SILICONE RUBBER (SILASTIC RTV 382) AND METHYL-2-CYANOACRYLATE (EASTMAN 910 ADHESIVE).
    HANNA C; SHIBLEY S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1965 Aug; 60():323-8. PubMed ID: 14333988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Friction enhancement via micro-patterned wet elastomer adhesives on small intestinal surfaces.
    Kwon J; Cheung E; Park S; Sitti M
    Biomed Mater; 2006 Dec; 1(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 18458409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Tensile Bond Strength between Soft Liners and Two Chemically Different Denture Base Materials: Effect of Thermocycling.
    Tugut F; Coskun ME; Dogan DO; Kirmali O; Akin H
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 26375732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins.
    Kutay O; Bilgin T; Sakar O; Beyli M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 7920404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Influence of pigments and opacifiers on color stability of an artificially aged facial silicone.
    dos Santos DM; Goiato MC; Moreno A; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Apr; 20(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 21077983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Outdoor weathering of facial prosthetic elastomers differing in Durometer hardness.
    Willett ES; Beatty MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 25455266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Physical properties of maxillofacial elastomers under conditions of accelerated aging.
    Yu R; Koran A; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jun; 59(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 6929289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Adhesive evaluation of three types of resilient denture liners bonded to heat-polymerized, autopolymerized, or CAD-CAM acrylic resin denture bases.
    Choi JE; Ng TE; Leong CKY; Kim H; Li P; Waddell JN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 29961623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Improvement of silicone rubber properties by addition of nano-SiO2 particles.
    Wu L; Wang X; Ning L; Han J; Wan Z; Lu M
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2016 Jul; 14 Suppl 1():e11-4. PubMed ID: 27339279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Effect of adhesive drying time on the bond strength of irreversible hydrocolloid to stainless steel.
    Leung KC; Chow TW; Woo EC; Clark RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 10220664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Alternative processing technique for MDX4-4210.
    Alfano SG; Taft RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):327. PubMed ID: 11552175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. The effect of bonding agents on the bond strengths of facial silicone elastomers to a visible light-activated resin.
    Polyzois GL; Frangou MJ; Andreopoulos AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 1811638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Environmental factors affecting mechanical properties of facial prosthetic elastomers.
    Mohite UH; Sandrik JL; Land MF; Byrne G
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 7802918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Biomechanical characterization of a low density silicone elastomer filled with hollow microspheres for maxillofacial prostheses.
    Liu Q; Shao LQ; Xiang HF; Zhen D; Zhao N; Yang SG; Zhang XL; Xu J
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2013; 24(11):1378-90. PubMed ID: 23796038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Frequency dependence of viscoelastic properties of medical grade silicones.
    Mahomed A; Chidi NM; Hukins DW; Kukureka SN; Shepherd DE
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Apr; 89(1):210-6. PubMed ID: 18823017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.