These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8464208)

  • 1. [A new white-noise campimeter].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 202(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 8464208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results of Rauschfeld examinations with the Tübingen electronic campimeter. A comparison with current perimetry procedures].
    Schiefer U; Köst G; Aulhorn E
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):508-15. PubMed ID: 2272584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perception of the blind spot with Rauschfeld campimetry. An additional diagnostic criterion in papillary changes].
    Aulhorn E; Schiefer U; Herzau V
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 2272585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [White noise field campimetry. A new form of perimetric examination].
    Aulhorn E; Köst G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 3404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U; Ulrich WD; Ulrich C; Wilhelm H; Aulhorn E
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Use of graphic analysis of topographic trends in perimetry].
    Weber J; Krieglstein GK
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 2086415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Graphic analysis of topographic trends in perimetry follow-up of glaucoma].
    Weber J; Krieglstein GK; Papoulis C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Nov; 195(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 2601277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sensitivity and specificity of masked field campimetry].
    Schiefer U; Pfau U; Selbmann HK; Wilhelm H; Zrenner E
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 7780274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Bebié curve (cumulative defect curve) for differentiating local and diffuse visual field defects].
    Kaufmann H; Flammer J
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 2625299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Procedures for the quantitative follow-up control of computerized perimetric findings in glaucoma].
    Grehn F; Burkard G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Nov; 193(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 3210646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma].
    Gramer E; Roesen B; Siebert M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Gray Scale of the Octopus N1 perimetry analysis program in neuro-ophthalmology].
    Safran AB; Mermoud C; Bouzouaïa C; Haefliger IO; Desangles D; de Weisse C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 May; 196(5):377-80. PubMed ID: 2366478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measuring the optic papilla with planimetry and the optic nerve head analyzer in glaucoma and suspected glaucoma. II. Correlations of the results of both methods with changes in the visual field, studied with the Octopus automatic perimeter].
    Stürmer J; Schaer-Stoller F; Gloor B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Mar; 196(3):132-42. PubMed ID: 2342313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Graphic and numerical presentation of visual field findings].
    Kaufmann H; Flammer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 May; 194(5):322-4. PubMed ID: 2747127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Computer program controlled perimetry, its advantages and disadvantages].
    Herbolzheimer WG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Oct; 189(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 3807218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Documentation of glaucomatous visual field defects in threshold and suprathreshold perimetry].
    Stark H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Mar; 200(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 1578877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter].
    Gramer E; Althaus G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.