These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Patenting Dr. Venter's genetic findings: is the National Institutes of Health creating hurdles or clearing the path for biotechnology's voyage in the twenty-first century? Riley PJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():309-26. PubMed ID: 10134812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. On gene patenting. Healy B N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):664-8. PubMed ID: 1640972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should genes be patented? The gene patenting controversy: legal, ethical, and policy foundations of an international agreement. Looney B Law Policy Int Bus; 1994; 26(1):231-72. PubMed ID: 11979605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biotechnology. Lawsuit challenges legal basis for patenting human genes. Marshall E Science; 2009 May; 324(5930):1000-1. PubMed ID: 19460975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Intellectual property. NIH roils academe with advice on licensing DNA patents. Malakoff D Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5665):1757-8. PubMed ID: 15031474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Razing the tollbooths. A call for restricting patents on basic biomedical research. Stix G Sci Am; 2003 Apr; 288(4):37. PubMed ID: 12661312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patent law and human genome research at the crossroads: the need for Congressional action. McKay DL Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1994; 10(2):465-98. PubMed ID: 16514752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes. Palombi L Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Federal judge and government of the United States against gene patenting]. Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D Med Sci (Paris); 2011; 27(6-7):662-6. PubMed ID: 21718652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The scramble to patent human genes. Nat Neurosci; 1999 Sep; 2(9):773. PubMed ID: 10461209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomics companies welcome US PTO initiative on DNA patents. Marshall A Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 9035129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene patent study drowned as OTA sinks. Macilwain C Nature; 1995 Aug; 376(6541):541. PubMed ID: 7637791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The coming US patent opposition. Apple T Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 15696151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]