206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8464998)
1. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
Burns CB; Renner JB
Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The use of copper and niobium filters in diagnostic x-ray equipment. A comparison of dose reduction, tube loading and picture quality].
Thorsen F; Mehus A; Nordanger J
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 Sep; 110(22):2878-80. PubMed ID: 2219065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Niobium/aluminum filters reduce patient exposure.
Burns CB; Renner JB; Gratale P; Moyle LL
Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 1736315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin exposure and thyroid dose distribution using niobium filtration.
Byrne CM; Pharoah MJ; Wood RE
J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug; 57(8):663-5. PubMed ID: 1889018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography.
Cardenosa G; Eklund GW
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):894-5. PubMed ID: 1535914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Niobium filter v. an aluminum filter.
Stirling GC; Holloway AF
Ont Dent; 1990 Oct; 67(8):25-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 2280962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Are additional filters made of niobium superior to the copper filter in dental radiology?].
Cordt I; Engelke W
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 2237349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
Küchler M; Friedrich M
Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Niobium filter v. an aluminum filter.
Stirling GC; Holloway AF
Ont Dent; 1990; 67(6):18-22. PubMed ID: 2094828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography.
Koedooder K; Venema HW
Phys Med Biol; 1986 Jun; 31(6):585-600. PubMed ID: 3755830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Niobium filters for dose reduction in pediatric radiology.
Jangland L; Axelsson B
Acta Radiol; 1990 Sep; 31(5):540-1. PubMed ID: 2261307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of image quality using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyangi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):73-5. PubMed ID: 7835506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the use of a niobium filter for patient dose reduction in chest radiography.
Thierens H; Kunnen M; Van der Plaetsen A; Segaert O
Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):334-40. PubMed ID: 2025775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of rare-earth filters on patient exposure and image contrast.
Mauriello SM; Washburn DB; Matteson SR
J Dent Res; 1987 Aug; 66(8):1326-30. PubMed ID: 3476600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
