135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8465213)
1. The Texas Breast Screening Project: Part I. Mammographic and clinical results.
Peters GN; Vogel VG; Evans WP; Bondy M; Halabi S; Lord J; Laville EA
South Med J; 1993 Apr; 86(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 8465213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Texas Breast Screening Project: Part II. Demographics, risk profiles, and health practices of participants.
Vogel VG; Bondy M; Halabi S; Lord J; Laville EA
South Med J; 1993 Apr; 86(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 8465214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A mammographic screening pilot project in Victoria 1988-1990. The Essendon Breast X-ray Program Collaborative Group.
Med J Aust; 1992 Nov; 157(10):670-3. PubMed ID: 1435408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer in a county hospital population: impact of breast screening on stage of presentation.
Leitch AM; Garvey RF
Ann Surg Oncol; 1994 Nov; 1(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 7850558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
Hobbs P; Kay C; Friedman EH; St Leger AS; Lambert C; Boggis CR; Howard TM; Owen AW; Asbury DL
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1314-6. PubMed ID: 2271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography screening in Italy: 2004 survey and 2005 preliminary data.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):7-20. PubMed ID: 17824359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and conduct of a low-cost mammography screening project: experience of the American Cancer Society, Texas Division.
Vogel VG; Peters GN; Evans WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1727357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography screening participation: effects of a media campaign targeting Italian-speaking women.
Page A; Morrell S; Tewson R; Taylor R; Brassil A
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Aug; 29(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 16222935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-initiated mobile mammography: analysis of the patients and the problems.
Rubin E; Frank MS; Stanley RJ; Bernreuter WK; Han SY
South Med J; 1990 Feb; 83(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 2305298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First organized screening mammography programme in Saudi Arabia: preliminary analysis of pilot round.
Akhtar SS; Nadrah HM; Al-Habdan MA; El Gabbani SA; El Farouk GM; Abdelgadir MH; Al-Saigul AM
East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Oct; 16(10):1025-31. PubMed ID: 21222417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian mammography screening programmes--1996-2004.
Giordano L; Giorgi D; Piccini P; Ventura L; Stefanini V; Senore C; Paci E; Segnan N
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):21-32. PubMed ID: 17824360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography.
Weaver DL; Rosenberg RD; Barlow WE; Ichikawa L; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Geller BM; Key CR; Maygarden SJ; Ballard-Barbash R
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):732-42. PubMed ID: 16411214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
