297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8466403)
41. Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.
Harris EK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 3355343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Accuracy of participant results utilized as target values in the CAP Chemistry Survey Program.
Hartmann AE; Naito HK; Burnett RW; Welch MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Oct; 109(10):894-903. PubMed ID: 3840001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Factors related to accuracy in office cholesterol testing. Iowa Academy of Family Physicians Research Network.
Erickson R; Driscoll C; Dvorak L; Gjerde C; Glanzer J; Arteaga M; Pisney F; Williamson P
J Fam Pract; 1991 Nov; 33(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 1940812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A manufacturer's approach to development of matrix robust methods.
Rautela GS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jul; 117(7):691-5. PubMed ID: 8323429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Nordic surveys of analytical quality in clinical chemistry laboratories.
Solberg HE; Björkhem I; Skrede S
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():103-13. PubMed ID: 6599511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
Ross JW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Investigation of cholesterol bias due to a matrix effect of external quality assurance samples: how true is your cholesterol method?
Pretorius CJ; Klingberg S; Johnson L; Park R; Wilgen U; Ungerer JP
Ann Clin Biochem; 2012 Nov; 49(Pt 6):538-41. PubMed ID: 23019601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Analytic goals, concentration relationships, and the state of the art for clinical laboratory precision.
Ross JW; Lawson NS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):495-513. PubMed ID: 7605165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The reference method value.
Franzini C
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 1809053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of 2 homogeneous high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays.
Hoang MP; Hirany SV; Parupia J; Devaraj S; Jialal I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):1005-9. PubMed ID: 9822130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design.
Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessment of analytical quality in Nordic clinical chemistry laboratories using data from contemporary national programs.
Aronsson T; Bjørnstad P; Leskinen E; Uldall A; de Verdier CH
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():115-24. PubMed ID: 6599512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [How external quality evaluation programs affect the quality of laboratory results in routine practice in the Czech Republic].
Valík D; Nekulová M; Pecen L; Votavová I
Cas Lek Cesk; 2001 Aug; 140(17):538-44. PubMed ID: 11702480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Generation and application of analytical goals in laboratory medicine.
Fraser CG
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 1809055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An evaluation of two compact analyzers used for lipid analysis.
McKenney JM; Fary DF; Miller G; Proctor JD; Chinchili VM
J Fam Pract; 1993 May; 36(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 8482937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Precision of a dry-chemistry method of lipid screening.
Bowden RG; Kingery PM; Long L
Public Health; 2006 Jun; 120(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 16730036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Analysis of the results of the SEIMC External Quality Control Program for HIV-1 and HCV viral loads, 2007].
; Orta Mira N; Guna Serrano Mdel R; Latorre Martínez JC; Ovies MR; Pérez JL; Gimeno Cardona C
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2008 Nov; 26 Suppl 13():8-13. PubMed ID: 19100161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A collaborative trial for the evaluation of blood cholesterol measurement in clinical laboratories in Italy.
Malavasi B; Catapano A; Galli G; Franzini C
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1992 Mar; 30(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 1599980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Lipid and lipoprotein testing in resource-limited laboratories.
Myers GL
Ethn Dis; 2003; 13(2 Suppl 2):S107-9. PubMed ID: 13677424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
