970 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8466405)
1. Achieving accuracy for routine clinical chemistry methods by using patient specimen correlations to assign calibrator values. A means of managing matrix effects.
Lasky FD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 8466405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matrix effects on proficiency testing materials. Impact on accuracy of cholesterol measurement in laboratories in the nation's largest hospital system.
Naito HK; Kwak YS; Hartfiel JL; Park JK; Travers EM; Myers GL; Ross JW; Eckfeldt JH; Hartmann AE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 8466396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Matrix effects and the accuracy of cholesterol analysis.
Ross JW; Myers GL; Gilmore BF; Cooper GR; Naito HR; Eckfeldt J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 8466403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy verification and identification of matrix effects. The College of American Pathologists' Protocol.
Eckfeldt JH; Copeland KR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 8466401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Centers for Disease Control-National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program. An approach to accurate and precise lipid measurements.
Myers GL; Cooper GR; Winn CL; Smith SJ
Clin Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 9(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 2538292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reference method value.
Franzini C
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 1809053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Nordic Trueness Project 2002: use of reference measurement procedure values in a general clinical chemistry survey.
Pedersen MM; Ornemark U; Rustad P; Steensland H; Loikkanen M; Olafsdóttir E; Henriksen GM; Jørgensen N; Uldall A; Nordin G; Nordberg UR
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):309-20. PubMed ID: 15223697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metrological traceability of values for alpha-amylase catalytic concentration assigned to a commutable calibrator materials.
Canalias F; García E; Sánchez M
Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Jan; 411(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 19799891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical power in the detection of matrix effects.
Long T
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 8466402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The stability of survey-assigned assay values when surveyed control materials are used in a daily interlaboratory quality control program. The College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey--Quality Assurance Service shared pool experience.
Lawson PL; Lawson NS; Ross JW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Apr; 119(4):312-33. PubMed ID: 7726725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Matrix effects in therapeutic drug monitoring surveys. Proposed protocol to identify error components and quality improvement opportunities.
Witte DL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 8466400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Standardization of the methods of lipid determination according to WHO in the regional project of prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia].
Grafnetter D; Feruglio GA; Vanuzzo D
G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 26(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 8690184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The how and why of an accuracy base for proficiency testing programs.
Welch MJ; Hertz HS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 3355329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matrix effects and accuracy assessment. Identifying matrix-sensitive methods from real-time proficiency testing data.
Lawson NS; Williams TL; Long T
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):401-11. PubMed ID: 8466404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical aspects of internal quality assurance.
Uldall A
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 1809060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference system for cholesterol measurements.
Cooper GR; Myers GL
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1990; 198():27-31. PubMed ID: 2189207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of proficiency testing in achieving standardization and harmonization between laboratories.
Miller WG
Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):232-5. PubMed ID: 19863911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Descriptive analytical data and consequences for calculation of common reference intervals in the Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000.
Rustad P; Felding P; Lahti A; Hyltoft Petersen P
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):343-70. PubMed ID: 15223700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
