These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8468104)

  • 1. Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review.
    Lynn SJ; Neufeld V; Maré C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):124-52. PubMed ID: 8468104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypnosis, suggestion type, and subjective experience--the order-effects hypothesis revisited: a brief communication.
    Weekes JR; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 2347670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of direct versus indirect hypnotic suggestion on pain in a cold pressor task.
    Maurer C; Santangelo M; Claiborn CD
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Oct; 41(4):305-16. PubMed ID: 8407019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The predictive utility of hypnotizability: the change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis.
    Milling LS; Coursen EL; Shores JS; Waszkiewicz JA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2010 Feb; 78(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20099958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: the role of resistance as a predictor variable.
    Groth-Marnat G; Mitchell K
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9780524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of "deepening" techniques on hypnotic depth and responding.
    Page RA; Handley GW
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jul; 40(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 1399153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypnosis treatment of clinical pain: understanding why hypnosis is useful.
    Holroyd J
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jan; 44(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 8582777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paradoxical experience of hypnotic analgesia in low hypnotizable fibromyalgic patients.
    Carli G; Suman AL; Biasi G; Marcolongo R; Santarcangelo EL
    Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Jun; 146(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 18822796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indirect versus direct hypnotic suggestions--an initial investigation: a brief communication.
    Matthews WJ; Bennett H; Bean W; Gallagher M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1985 Jul; 33(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 4030151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Durability of "posthypnotic suggestions" as a function of type of suggestion and trance depth.
    Berrigan LP; Kurtz RM; Stabile JP; Strube MJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Jan; 39(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 2001895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive strategies in hypnosis: toward resolving the hypnotic conflict.
    Bartis SP; Zamansky HS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Jul; 38(3):168-82. PubMed ID: 2394534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies.
    Meyer EC; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):327-49. PubMed ID: 21644124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ericksonian approaches to hypnosis and therapy: where are we now?
    Matthews WJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Oct; 48(4):418-26; discussion 433-7. PubMed ID: 11011501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response expectancy as a mediator of hypnotizability modification: a brief communication.
    Gearan P; Kirsch I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 8468105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laser-induced pain-related brain potentials and sensory pain ratings in high and low hypnotizable subjects during hypnotic suggestions of relaxation, dissociated imagery, focused analgesia, and placebo.
    Zachariae R; Bjerring P
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Jan; 42(1):56-80. PubMed ID: 8112928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fibromyalgia pain and its modulation by hypnotic and non-hypnotic suggestion: an fMRI analysis.
    Derbyshire SW; Whalley MG; Oakley DA
    Eur J Pain; 2009 May; 13(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 18653363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of direct versus indirect hypnotic induction techniques on reduction of experimental pain.
    Van Gorp WG; Meyer RG; Dunbar KD
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1985 Oct; 33(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 3897076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focused analgesia and generalized relaxation produce differential hypnotic analgesia in response to ascending stimulus intensity.
    Sharav Y; Tal M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Apr; 52(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15050376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of direct and indirect hypnotic suggestions for analgesia in high and low susceptible subjects.
    Fricton JR; Roth P
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1985 Apr; 27(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 4014055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.