268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8468338)
1. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Finite element analysis on fracture relevance as bone defect of proximal femur].
Zhang S; Tu CQ; Duan H; Min L; Zhou Y; Zhang SL; Jiang Y; Feng P
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Mar; 42(2):273-6, 279. PubMed ID: 21500571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology.
Gong H; Zhang M; Fan Y; Kwok WL; Leung PC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1575-85. PubMed ID: 22258889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical and finite element study of drilling sites for benign lesions in femoral head and neck with curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation.
Dou B; Zhang FF; Ni M; Dai YH; Wang ZY; Qin T; Ma WQ; Zhu W; Mei J
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(6):7808-7828. PubMed ID: 31698641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-Neck Osteoplasty has Minor Effect on the Strength of an Ovine Cam-FAI Model: In Vitro and Finite Element Analyses.
Maquer G; Bürki A; Nuss K; Zysset PK; Tannast M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2633-2640. PubMed ID: 27535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of a percutaneous technique for repairing proximal femora with simulated metastatic lesions.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 16949854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lytic lesions in the femoral neck: Importance of location and evaluation of a novel minimally invasive repair technique.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 18327790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of bone lesion location on femoral bone strength assessed by MRI-based finite-element modeling.
Rajapakse CS; Gupta N; Evans M; Alizai H; Shukurova M; Hong AL; Cruickshank NJ; Tejwani N; Egol K; Honig S; Chang G
Bone; 2019 May; 122():209-217. PubMed ID: 30851438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateral drill holes decrease strength of the femur: an observational study using finite element and experimental analyses.
Fox MJ; Scarvell JM; Smith PN; Kalyanasundaram S; Stachurski ZH
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 8():29. PubMed ID: 24004617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a surrogate model based on patient weight, bone mass and geometry to predict femoral neck strains and fracture loads.
Taylor M; Perilli E; Martelli S
J Biomech; 2017 Apr; 55():121-127. PubMed ID: 28325584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures.
Sivasundaram R; Shah S; Ahmadi S; Wunder JS; Schemitsch EH; Ferguson PC; Zdero R
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):e174-80. PubMed ID: 23249892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: a preliminary study on patients with hip fracture.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Okazaki H; Sato W; Kominami H; Matsunaga S; Nakamura K
J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 16228668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Tehranzadeh J; Skinner HB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Aug; (437):219-28. PubMed ID: 16056052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of impending femoral neck fractures: the role of percutaneous cement augmentation for osteolytic lesions.
Palumbo BT; Nalley C; Gaskins RB; Gutierrez S; Alexander GE; Anijar L; Nayak A; Cheong D; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Mar; 29(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 24461558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
