These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 846845)
1. [Protection of "demand" cardiac pacemakers against exterior electromagnetic influences by a metal capsule: reality or fiction?]. Grand A; Drouin B; Ferry M; Peyredieu du Charlat G; Tabet R; Morel C Nouv Presse Med; 1977 Mar; 6(10):855. PubMed ID: 846845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Electromagnetic fields and ventricular demand pacemakers]. Birmann L; Friederici R; Sacrez A Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 1977 May; 114(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 890882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of electromagnetic interference and ionizing radiation on cardiac pacemakers. Salmi J; Eskola HJ; Pitkänen MA; Malmivuo JA Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Feb; 166(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 2315844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Interference between cardiac pacemaker and electromagnetic anti-theft devices in stores]. Beaugeard D; Kacet S; Bricout M; Camblin J Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1992 Oct; 85(10):1457-61. PubMed ID: 1297295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pacemaker failure due to electromagnetic interference (author's transl)]. Lampadius MS; Wirtzfeld A; Himmler FC Med Klin; 1975 Aug; 70(35):1380-5. PubMed ID: 1177793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reactions of modern cardiac pacemakers to interference sources]. Gebhardt-Seehausen U; Recker S Lebensversicher Med; 1984 Jan; 36(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 6141481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Current problems with demand pacemakers. Barold SS Eur J Cardiol; 1974 Apr; 1(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 4606401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The electromagnetic compatibility test requirements for cardiac pacemaker in international standards]. Liu L; Gao Z Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 34(5):365-7. PubMed ID: 21179715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Changes in pacemakers and the wearers of pacemakers as a result of the use of different electromagnetic energy sources]. Vergassola R; Borgioli A; Chiodi L; Rossi D; Fazi A; Lebrun E; Vaccari M Minerva Cardioangiol; 1994; 42(1-2):27-32. PubMed ID: 8022542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Pacemaker-treated patients and electromagnetic interference during cardiac surgery]. Shigenobu M; Teramoto S Kyobu Geka; 1987 Nov; 40(12):988-91. PubMed ID: 3437635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [A measuring apparatus for pacemaker interference by electromagnetic fields]. van Nimwegen C Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Oct; 125(42):1709-10. PubMed ID: 7312054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Is there any risk interaction between electromagnetic field generated by mobile phones and artificial pacemakers]. Derkacz A; Poreba R; Skoczyńska A; Andrzejak R Med Pr; 2001; 52(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 11761658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The interference of electronic implants in low frequency electromagnetic fields. Silny J Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2003 Apr; 96 Spec No 3():30-4. PubMed ID: 12741329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vivo Study of Electromagnetic Interference With Pacemakers Caused by Everyday Electric and Magnetic Fields. Stunder D; Seckler T; Joosten S; Zink MD; Driessen S; Kraus T; Marx N; Napp A Circulation; 2017 Feb; 135(9):907-909. PubMed ID: 28242642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electromagnetic field interference and cardiac pacemakers. Jones SL Phys Ther; 1976 Sep; 56(9):1013-8. PubMed ID: 959327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Pacemaker patients and electric equipment in the environment]. Malinen S Duodecim; 1980; 96(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 7408721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Interim guidelines on limits of exposure to 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields. International Non-ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association. Health Phys; 1990 Jan; 58(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 2294069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]