111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8468718)
1. Pro-tobacco group attempts to discredit EPA's announcement.
Mahaney FX
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Apr; 85(8):609-10. PubMed ID: 8468718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: EPA's weight-of-evidence analysis.
Jinot J; Bayard S
J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 47(4):339-49; discussion 351-3. PubMed ID: 7730859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EPA's passive smoke assessment: where is it?
Reynolds T
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Apr; 84(7):480-1. PubMed ID: 1545436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tobacco: who pays whom?
Gori GB
Science; 1998 Sep; 281(5384):1805-6. PubMed ID: 9776683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. EPA finds passive smoking causes lung cancer.
Reynolds T
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Feb; 85(3):179-80. PubMed ID: 8423620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Response to Dr. Barry's article on Environmental tobacco smoke/regarding Mr. Wilson's letter.
Bayard S; Jinot J
Risk Anal; 1996 Jun; 16(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 8693156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Multicenter case-control study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in Europe.
Denson KW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1999 May; 91(9):803-4. PubMed ID: 10328113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk, radon, and rationality.
Baker TD; Go V
Md Med J; 1995 Mar; 44(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 7707854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Invited commentary: confounding, measurement error, and publication bias in studies of passive smoking.
Kawachi I; Colditz GA
Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Nov; 144(10):909-15. PubMed ID: 8916501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A causal connection between lung cancer and passive smoking: the report from the American Environmental Protection Agency].
Jansen DF; van Barneveld TA; van Leeuwen FE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Mar; 138(10):500-3. PubMed ID: 8139707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Passive smoking.
Gori GB
Lancet; 1993 Apr; 341(8850):965. PubMed ID: 8096303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dietary fat and breast cancer: where do we stand on the evidence?
Wynder EL; Cohen LA; Rose DP; Stellman SD
J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Mar; 47(3):217-22; discussion 223-30. PubMed ID: 8138832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency.
Tob Control; 1997; 6(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 9583639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Risk of lung cancer due to passive smoking still unproven].
de Wolff FA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Mar; 138(10):503-6. PubMed ID: 8139708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissent: The risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers in the United States: a causal association with environmental tobacco smoke.
Van Leeuwen FE
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 May; 48(5):599-601; discussion 603-6. PubMed ID: 7730917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: the emerging role of carcinogen biomarkers and molecular epidemiology.
Hecht SS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Sep; 86(18):1369-70. PubMed ID: 8072024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The hot air on passive smoking. BAT has not tried to discredit data on passive smoking.
Proctor CJ
BMJ; 1998 Aug; 317(7154):349. PubMed ID: 9729087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental tobacco smoke: a public health conspiracy? A dissenting view.
Farland W; Bayard S; Jinot J
J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 47(4):335-7; discussion 351-3. PubMed ID: 7730858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Resisting smoke and spin.
Lancet; 2000 Apr; 355(9211):1197. PubMed ID: 10770294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace: the legal impact of federal and Ontario occupational health and safety legislation.
Hyman W
Health Law J; 1996; 4():221-57. PubMed ID: 10569890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
