These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8469125)

  • 1. A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.
    Schweickert R
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Mar; 21(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 8469125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.
    Li X; Schweickert R; Gandour J
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1116-25. PubMed ID: 11126935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.
    Hulme C; Roodenrys S; Schweickert R; Brown GD; Martin M; Stuart G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1217-32. PubMed ID: 9293631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age and redintegration in immediate memory and their relationship to task difficulty.
    Neale K; Tehan G
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1940-53. PubMed ID: 18265610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A redintegration account of the effects of speech rate, lexicality, and word frequency in immediate serial recall.
    Lewandowsky S; Farrell S
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 10946590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Irausquin RS; de Gelder B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):342-69. PubMed ID: 9178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redintegration, task difficulty, and immediate serial recall tasks.
    Ritchie G; Tolan GA; Tehan G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 25730640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.
    Dosher BA; Ma JJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):316-35. PubMed ID: 9530842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
    Neath I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate serial recall, word frequency, item identity and item position.
    Poirier M; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Dec; 50(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 9025332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When meaning is useless.
    Benetello A; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1001-12. PubMed ID: 25121998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interaction of word frequency and concreteness in immediate serial recall.
    Miller LM; Roodenrys S
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):850-65. PubMed ID: 19679864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning phonotactic-like regularities in immediate serial recall.
    Fischer-Baum S; Warker JA; Holloway C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):129-146. PubMed ID: 31928028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell?
    Schweickert R; Boruff B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jul; 12(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 2942626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 21928932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.