96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8469998)
1. Cost-effectiveness in nuclear medicine.
Patton DD
Semin Nucl Med; 1993 Jan; 23(1):9-30. PubMed ID: 8469998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and economic outcomes assessment in nuclear cardiology.
Shaw LJ; Miller DD; Berman DS; Hachamovitch R
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 10967624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the effectiveness of disease and injury prevention programs: costs and consequences.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1995 Aug; 44(RR-10):1-10. PubMed ID: 7565538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic evaluation studies in nuclear medicine: the need for standardization.
Dietlein M; Knapp WH; Lauterbach KW; Schicha H
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 26(6):663-80. PubMed ID: 10369954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quality criteria for cost-benefit analysis in oncologic nuclear medicine and state of its realization].
Dietlein M; Scheidhauer K; Lauterbach KW; Schicha H
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Jan; 93(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10198979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision analysis in nuclear medicine.
Gambhir SS
J Nucl Med; 1999 Sep; 40(9):1570-81. PubMed ID: 10492381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using cost-effectiveness/cost-benefit analysis to allocate health resources: a level playing field for prevention?
Phillips KA; Hotlgrave DR
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 9037338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Difficult decisions: weighing treatment costs and benefits.
Wainio JA
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Jan; 14(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10140805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the most common diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease].
Dewey M; Hamm B
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jun; 129(25-26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 15213872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effective critical care: cost containment and rationing.
Rubenfeld GD
Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 22875388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lies, damn lies and cost-effectiveness.
McGuigan JA
Ulster Med J; 1998 Jun; 67 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):66-9. PubMed ID: 9807959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation studies in nuclear medicine: a methodological review of the literature.
Gambhir SS; Schwimmer J
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 10967623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness analysis: a review.
Rutigliano MJ
Neurosurgery; 1995 Sep; 37(3):436-43; discussion 443-4. PubMed ID: 7501108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Costing nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures].
Markou P
Hell J Nucl Med; 2005; 8(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 15886748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canadian health care and neurosurgery: the good, the bad and the ugly.
Findlay JM
World Neurosurg; 2010 Jul; 74(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 21299984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Value for money in the health sector: the contribution of primary health care.
Mills A; Drummond M
Health Policy Plan; 1987 Jun; 2(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 10312103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis.
Law R; Das A; Gregory D; Komanduri S; Muthusamy R; Rastogi A; Vargo J; Wallace MB; Raju GS; Mounzer R; Klapman J; Shah J; Watson R; Wilson R; Edmundowicz SA; Wani S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1248-57. PubMed ID: 26608129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The synergy of pathways and algorithms: two tools work better than one.
Schriefer J
Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1994 Sep; 20(9):485-99. PubMed ID: 7804408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost efficiency of nuclear cardiology services in the modern health care environment.
Miller DD
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2004 Jan; 6(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 14662097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
