221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8470589)
1. Volumetric flow rates in the portal venous system: measurement with cine phase-contrast MR imaging.
Burkart DJ; Johnson CD; Morton MJ; Wolf RL; Ehman RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 8470589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of breath-hold 2D phase-contrast with non breath-hold cine phase-contrast MRA in the assessment of azygos venous blood flow in portal hypertension.
Ng WH; Chan YL; Sung JY; Lee YT; Lee SF; Chung SS
MAGMA; 2004 Apr; 16(5):211-7. PubMed ID: 15022053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation.
Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of normal renal artery blood flow: cine phase-contrast MR imaging vs clearance of p-aminohippurate.
Wolf RL; King BF; Torres VE; Wilson DM; Ehman RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):995-1002. PubMed ID: 8273644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quantification of blood flow using MR imaging with pre-saturation band].
Kishimoto R
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jan; 56(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8857093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of arterial and venous blood flow in the mesenteric system based on MR findings. 1993 ARRS Executive Council Award.
Burkart DJ; Johnson CD; Ehman RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1279-82. PubMed ID: 8249742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR angiography and dynamic flow evaluation of the portal venous system.
Edelman RR; Zhao B; Liu C; Wentz KU; Mattle HP; Finn JP; McArdle C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Oct; 153(4):755-60. PubMed ID: 2773730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Blood flow measurement of portal vein with fast cine phase contrast MR imaging under breath-holding].
Inaba F; Murakami T; Sakurai K; Tsuda K; Kim T; Tanaka H; Kashiwagi N; Harada K; Nakamura H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Mar; 56(4):217-9. PubMed ID: 8992460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Azygos blood flow: phase contrast quantitation in volunteers and patients with portal hypertension pre- and postintrahepatic shunt placement.
Debatin JF; Zahner B; Meyenberger C; Romanowski B; Schöpke W; Marincek B; Fuchs WA
Hepatology; 1996 Nov; 24(5):1109-15. PubMed ID: 8903384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chronic liver disease: systemic and splanchnic venous flow mapping with optimized cine phase-contrast MR imaging validated in a phantom model and prospectively evaluated in patients.
Gouya H; Vignaux O; Sogni P; Mallet V; Oudjit A; Pol S; Legmann P
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):144-55. PubMed ID: 21771955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of portal venous hypertension with cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements: high association of hyperdynamic portal flow with variceal hemorrhage.
Burkart DJ; Johnson CD; Ehman RL; Weaver AL; Ilstrup DM
Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 8351326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation.
Kondo C; Caputo GR; Semelka R; Foster E; Shimakawa A; Higgins CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2048544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements: improved precision using an automated method of vessel detection.
Burkart DJ; Felmlee JP; Johnson CD; Wolf RL; Weaver AL; Ehman RL
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(3):469-75. PubMed ID: 8188918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability of consecutive in vivo MR flow measurements in the main portal vein.
Hara AK; Burkart DJ; Johnson CD; Felmlee JP; Ehman RL; Ilstrup DM; Harmsen WS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 8633438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal and altered three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Stankovic Z; Csatari Z; Deibert P; Euringer W; Blanke P; Kreisel W; Abdullah Zadeh Z; Kallfass F; Langer M; Markl M
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):862-73. PubMed ID: 22357888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-time interactive duplex MR measurements: application in neurovascular imaging.
Wetzel SG; Lee VS; Tan AG; Heid O; Cha S; Johnson G; Rofsky NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 11517079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global left ventricular perfusion: noninvasive measurement with cine MR imaging and phase velocity mapping of coronary venous outflow.
van Rossum AC; Visser FC; Hofman MB; Galjee MA; Westerhof N; Valk J
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):685-91. PubMed ID: 1535881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blood flow in the portal vein: velocity quantitation with phase-contrast MR angiography.
Applegate GR; Thaete FL; Meyers SP; Davis PL; Talagala SL; Recht M; Wozney P; Kanal E
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 8451423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Portal blood flow: measurement with MR imaging.
Tamada T; Moriyasu F; Ono S; Shimizu K; Kajimura K; Soh Y; Kawasaki T; Kimura T; Yamashita Y; Someda H
Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 2682771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow: simultaneous assessment with Bayesian multipoint velocity-encoded MR imaging.
Knobloch V; Binter C; Kurtcuoglu V; Kozerke S
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 24471394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
