341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8470612)
1. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.
Eichenberger AC; Jenni R; von Schulthess GK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):971-7. PubMed ID: 8470612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation].
Tei C; Kisanuki A; Arikawa K; Otsuji Y; Arima S; Kashima T; Tanaka H; Kushitani M; Shah PM
J Cardiogr; 1985 Mar; 15(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 4067338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of valvular heart disease with cine gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging.
Higgins CB; Wagner S; Kondo C; Suzuki J; Caputo GR
Circulation; 1991 Sep; 84(3 Suppl):I198-207. PubMed ID: 1884487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography.
Caruthers SD; Lin SJ; Brown P; Watkins MP; Williams TA; Lehr KA; Wickline SA
Circulation; 2003 Nov; 108(18):2236-43. PubMed ID: 14568899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques].
Nakamura K; Shiina T; Satomi G; Sakai K; Tamura K; Matsumura K; Umemura J; Magosaki N; Koyanagi H; Hirosawa K
J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 3333519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Velocity-encoded cine MR imaging in aortic coarctation: functional assessment of hemodynamic events.
Hom JJ; Ordovas K; Reddy GP
Radiographics; 2008; 28(2):407-16. PubMed ID: 18349448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Value of the continuous Doppler in the evaluation of gradients of aortic valvular stenosis in the adult].
Mertl C; Isorni C; Rey JL; Choquet D; Duboisset M; Lesbre JP
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1988 Jun; 81(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 3144945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation.
Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].
Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J
Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate quantitation of regurgitant volume with MRI in patients selected for mitral valve repair.
Westenberg JJ; Doornbos J; Versteegh MI; Bax JJ; van der Geest RJ; de Roos A; Dion RA; Reiber JH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):462-6; discussion 467. PubMed ID: 15740956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The effect of concomitant aortic valve insufficiency on the values of Doppler sonographic gradient determination in patients with aortic stenosis].
Siostrzonek P; Kronik G; Jung M; Gössinger H; Schmoliner R; Zangeneh M; Salzer U; Klicpera M; Mösslacher H
Z Kardiol; 1988 Dec; 77(12):774-9. PubMed ID: 3250139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic valve gradients].
Kronik G; Siostrzonek P; Zangeneh M; Schmoliner R; Gössinger H; Mösslacher H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1987 Oct; 99(20):712-5. PubMed ID: 2961132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantitative evaluation of aortic stenosis using continuous wave Doppler].
Zhu WL
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1989 Feb; 17(1):7-9, 61. PubMed ID: 2766948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heart motion-adapted MR velocity mapping of blood velocity distribution downstream of aortic valve prostheses: initial experience.
Kozerke S; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):548-55. PubMed ID: 11161177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Valvular aortic stenosis: risk of syncope.
Omran H; Fehske W; Rabahieh R; Hagendorff A; Pizzulli L; Zirbes M; Lüderitz B
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8834722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure gradients across bileaflet aortic valves by direct measurement and echocardiography.
Laske A; Jenni R; Maloigne M; Vassalli G; Bertel O; Turina MI
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Jan; 61(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 8561632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cine MR imaging with Doppler echocardiography for the evaluation of aortic regurgitation.
Pflugfelder PW; Landzberg JS; Cassidy MM; Cheitlin MD; Schiller NB; Auffermann W; Higgins CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Apr; 152(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 2784253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures.
Torii R; El-Hamamsy I; Donya M; Babu-Narayan SV; Ibrahim M; Kilner PJ; Mohiaddin RH; Xu XY; Yacoub MH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 22361248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
