These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8471153)

  • 1. New advances in automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Jones KC; Himel HN; Towler MA; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    Burns; 1993 Apr; 19(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8471153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Phung D; Abidin MR; Thacker JG; Rodeheaver GT; Westwater JJ; Doctor A; Edlich RF
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1988; 9(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 3192614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new device for securing meshed split-thickness skin grafts.
    Himel HN; Rodeheaver GT; Luterman A; Hargroder A; Bentrem DJ; Bill TJ; Morgan RF; Edlich RF
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1994 Dec; 28(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 7899842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical performance of a disposable graft stapler with absorbable skin tacs.
    Himel HN; Bill TJ; Bentrem DJ; Hargroder A; Morgan RF; Edlich RF
    Burns; 1994 Jun; 20(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 8054138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revolutionary advances in skin stapling: a collective review.
    Edlich RF; Woodard CR; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(1-2):73-91. PubMed ID: 11495107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific basis for the selection of surgical staples and tissue adhesives for closure of skin wounds.
    Edlich RF; Gubler K; Stevens HS; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Rhoads SK; Long WB
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 21284596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design.
    Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.
    Meiring L; Cilliers K; Barry R; Nel CJ
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Sep; 62(11):371-2. PubMed ID: 7112304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Myotomy length determinants in endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for small Zenker's diverticula.
    Richtsmeier WJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2005 May; 114(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 15966519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
    Salyer C; Spuzzillo A; Wakefield D; Gomaa D; Thompson J; Goodman M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):4016-4021. PubMed ID: 32749610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of disposable stapler in operative cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst.
    Yunoki Y; Takeuchi H; Yasui Y; Tanakaya K; Konaga E; Hamazaki K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3271-3. PubMed ID: 10626199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.
    Stockley I; Elson RA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Mar; 69(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 3566131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of automatic staplers in small bowel anastomoses.
    Bluett MK; Healy DA; Kalemeris GC; O'Leary JP
    South Med J; 1986 Jun; 79(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 3715535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC; Foresman PA; Bill TJ; Bentrem DJ; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element modelling of stapled colorectal end-to-end anastomosis: advantages of variable height stapler design.
    Nováček V; Tran TN; Klinge U; Tolba RH; Staat M; Bronson DG; Miesse AM; Whiffen J; Turquier F
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2693-7. PubMed ID: 22871347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.
    Lubowski D; Hunt D
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1985 Aug; 55(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 3915865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
    Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel narrow profile articulating powered vascular stapler provides superior access and haemostasis equivalent to conventional devices†.
    Ng CS; Pickens A; Siegel JM; Clymer JW; Cummings JF
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i73-8. PubMed ID: 26464450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter prospective evaluation of a new articulating 5-mm endoscopic linear stapler.
    Kuthe A; Haemmerle A; Ludwig K; Falck S; Hiller W; Mainik F; Freys S; Dubovoy L; Jaehne J; Oldhafer K
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1883-93. PubMed ID: 26208498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond the "B": a new concept of the surgical staple enabling miniature staplers.
    Demertzis S; Beslac O; Mettler D; Zalokar D; Spangler T; Hausen B; Swanstrom L
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3674-84. PubMed ID: 25795379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.