249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8471434)
1. Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study.
Sørensen JB; Klee M; Palshof T; Hansen HH
Br J Cancer; 1993 Apr; 67(4):773-5. PubMed ID: 8471434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Functionality Assessment Flowchart (FAF): a new simple and reliable method to measure performance status with a high percentage of agreement between observers.
Paiva CE; Siquelli FA; Santos HA; Costa MM; Massaro DR; Lacerda DC; Nunes JS; de Pádua Souza C; Paiva BS
BMC Cancer; 2015 Jul; 15():501. PubMed ID: 26142726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scales.
Roila F; Lupattelli M; Sassi M; Basurto C; Bracarda S; Picciafuoco M; Boschetti E; Milella G; Ballatori E; Tonato M
Ann Oncol; 1991 Jun; 2(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 1768630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among health care professionals: a systematic review.
Chow R; Chiu N; Bruera E; Krishnan M; Chiu L; Lam H; DeAngelis C; Pulenzas N; Vuong S; Chow E
Ann Palliat Med; 2016 Apr; 5(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 27121736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer variation in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders. Criteria for and impact on diagnostic decision-making.
Jarløv AE
Dan Med Bull; 2000 Nov; 47(5):328-39. PubMed ID: 11155660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.
Storr A; Venetis CA; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-observer variability in the assessment of nerve function in leprosy patients in Ethiopia.
Lienhardt C; Currie H; Wheeler JG
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis; 1995 Mar; 63(1):62-76. PubMed ID: 7730721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: the significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fractures.
Thomsen NO; Olsen LH; Nielsen ST
J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11956974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability of performance status assessment between patients with hematologic malignancies and their physicians.
Leal AD; Allmer C; Maurer MJ; Shanafelt TD; Cerhan JR; Link BK; Thompson CA
Leuk Lymphoma; 2018 Mar; 59(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 28718335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients.
Taylor AE; Olver IN; Sivanthan T; Chi M; Purnell C
Support Care Cancer; 1999 Sep; 7(5):332-5. PubMed ID: 10483818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients over 65 years are assigned lower ECOG PS scores than younger patients, although objectively measured physical activity is no different.
Broderick JM; Hussey J; Kennedy MJ; O' Donnell DM
J Geriatr Oncol; 2014 Jan; 5(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 24484718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should patient-rated performance status affect treatment decisions in advanced lung cancer?
Dajczman E; Kasymjanova G; Kreisman H; Swinton N; Pepe C; Small D
J Thorac Oncol; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1133-6. PubMed ID: 18827609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the quality of life of cancer patients: assessments by patients, significant others, physicians and nurses.
Sneeuw KC; Aaronson NK; Sprangers MA; Detmar SB; Wever LD; Schornagel JH
Br J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 81(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 10487617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of inter-observer agreement when using a clinical respiratory scoring system in pre-weaned dairy calves.
Buczinski S; Faure C; Jolivet S; Abdallah A
N Z Vet J; 2016 Jul; 64(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 26878417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance status assessment in cancer patients.
Conill C; Verger E; Salamero M
Cancer; 1990 Apr; 65(8):1864-6. PubMed ID: 2317765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A robust statistic AC₁ for assessing inter-observer agreement in reliability studies].
Nishiura H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1485-91. PubMed ID: 21099180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
