These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8471562)

  • 1. Present-day performance qualities of cardiotocographs.
    Carter MC
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100 Suppl 9():10-4. PubMed ID: 8471562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal processing and display--cardiotocographs.
    Carter MC
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100 Suppl 9():21-3. PubMed ID: 8471565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impediments to a unified international approach to the interpretation and management of intrapartum cardiotocographs.
    Parer JT; Ugwumadu A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(3):272-273. PubMed ID: 27046650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of cardiotocographs.
    Carter MC; Genevier ES; Chong LC; Sutherland IA; Woodhouse P; Murray HG; Kirk DL; Symonds EM; Steer PJ; Beard RW
    J Biomed Eng; 1990 May; 12(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 2348718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Litigation and the cardiotocogram.
    Symonds EM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100 Suppl 9():8-9. PubMed ID: 8471570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation. Using pinnards and Dopplers in low risk women.
    Wrightson J
    Pract Midwife; 2002; 5(7):35-9. PubMed ID: 12123191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doppler ultrasound monitoring technology.
    Docker MF
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100 Suppl 9():18-20. PubMed ID: 8471564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of intrapartum cardiotocography in twin deliveries.
    Bakker PC; Colenbrander GJ; Verstraeten AA; Van Geijn HP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 15592300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of uterine contractions on fetal heart rate in pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
    Sletten J; Kiserud T; Kessler J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1129-35. PubMed ID: 27460848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical overview of cardiotocography.
    Spencer JA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100 Suppl 9():4-7. PubMed ID: 8471569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The normal preterm foetal heart rate pattern.
    Mathai M; Vijaykumar S; Joseph R; Karthikeyan NG; Regi A; Peedicayil A; Jasper P
    Indian J Med Res; 1995 Mar; 101():108-10. PubMed ID: 7751037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cardiotocography practice case no. 24].
    Heinrich J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1993; 115(6):298-9. PubMed ID: 8342354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of CTG during pregnancy and childbirth].
    Schneider KT; Butterwegge M; Daumer M; Dudenhausen J; Feige A; Gonser M; Hecher K; Jensen A; Koepcke E; Künzel W; Roemer VM; Schmidt S; Vetter K
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2006 Apr; 210(2):38-49. PubMed ID: 16565938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An algorithm for the recovery of fetal heart rate series from CTG data.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P; Fedele F; Bracale M
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):663-9. PubMed ID: 16893537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early, variable and late decelerations: can a consensus be reached in their identification?
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Jun; 65(3):305-6. PubMed ID: 10428354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards in fetal monitoring--practical requirements for uterine activity measurement and recording.
    Steer PJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100 Suppl 9():32-6. PubMed ID: 8471568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Critique of the quality of clinical studies of intensive fetal monitoring sub partu and subsequent conclusions. Final comment on the article by H. Schneider: "Intensive fetal monitoring sub partu or the quality of clinical research"].
    Saling E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M126-9. PubMed ID: 8974890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modern intrapartum fetal monitoring: room for improvement?
    Tempfer C; Hefler L; Husslein P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 17342497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 62: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1161-9. PubMed ID: 15863569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.