These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8471787)

  • 1. Reexamination of gender differences in the source location of N1m.
    Jacobson GP; Tepley N; Peterson EL; Newman CW; Ahmad BK; Kanna I; Moran J; Wharton J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 8471787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuromagnetic responses elicited by auditory stimuli in dichotic listening.
    Kuriki S; Takeuchi F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 1716566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) component N1.
    Jacobson GP; Lombardi DM; Gibbens ND; Ahmad BK; Newman CW
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 1487089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
    Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.
    Dimitrijevic A; Alsamri J; John MS; Purcell D; George S; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e322-35. PubMed ID: 27556365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of center frequency and bandwidth on the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 16797895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of interaural time and level differences on the binaural interaction component of the 80 Hz auditory steady-state response.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 18637411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory temporal resolution in children assessed by magnetoencephalography.
    Diedler J; Pietz J; Bast T; Rupp A
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1691-5. PubMed ID: 17921870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occurrence of auditory evoked field (AEF) N1M and P2M components in a sample of normal subjects.
    Jacobson GP; Ahmad BK; Moran J; Newman CW; Wharton J; Tepley N
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 1487099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different contra-sound effects between noise and music stimuli seen in N1m and psychophysical responses.
    Shirakura M; Kawase T; Kanno A; Ohta J; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261637. PubMed ID: 34928999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and degree of hearing loss on the agreement and correlation between sound field audiometric thresholds and tone burst auditory brainstem response thresholds in infants and young children.
    Lee CY; Jaw FS; Pan SL; Hsieh TH; Hsu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 107(11):869-75. PubMed ID: 18971156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():7-14. PubMed ID: 8203246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.