These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment. Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Balancing social acceptability with treatment effectiveness of an intrusive procedure: a case report. Grace NC; Kahng SW; Fisher WW J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):171-2. PubMed ID: 8188557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Carr JE; Severtson JM; Lepper TL Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 18467073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Functional analysis and treatment of self-injurious behavior in young children a summary of 30 cases. Kurtz PF; Chin MD; Huete JM; Tarbox RS; O'Connor JT; Paclawskyj TR; Rush KS J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 12858985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior. Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Extinction of self-injurious escape behavior with and without instructional fading. Zarcone JR; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Jagtiani S; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 8407683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training. Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Kahng SW J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 10885525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The evaluation and treatment of aggression maintained by attention and automatic reinforcement. Thompson RH; Fisher WW; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 9532754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A methodology for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects associated with response blocking. Lerman DC; Iwata BA J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 8682737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training. Kahng S; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Worsdell AS J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):267-76; quiz 277. PubMed ID: 9210306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes. Lalli JS; Kates K J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Within-session patterns of self-injury as indicators of behavioral function. Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Zarcone JR; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL Res Dev Disabil; 1993; 14(6):479-92. PubMed ID: 8296027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of a positive procedure to increase engagement on-task and decrease challenging behavior. Beare PL; Severson S; Brandt P Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 14710706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior. Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Langdon NA Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 8085030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Teacher use of descriptive analysis data to implement interventions to decrease students' problem behaviors. Lalli JS; Browder DM; Mace FC; Brown DK J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 8331019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]