BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8473591)

  • 1. A comparison of the shear bond strengths to a resin composite of two conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.
    Chadwick RG; Woolford MJ
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8473591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives.
    Gordan VV; Boyer D; Söderholm KJ
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 9699443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of shear bond strength of silorane resin to conventional, resin-modified glass ionomers and nano-ionomer cements.
    Babannavar R; Shenoy A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23355365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a titanium composite resin material with dentinal bonding agents versus glass ionomer cements.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):904-9. PubMed ID: 1494117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Inokoshi S; Burrow MF; Sano H; Tagami J
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):479-85. PubMed ID: 9699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites.
    Li J; Liu Y; Liu Y; Söremark R; Sundström F
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1996 Feb; 54(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8669242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength measurements of fissure sealant to glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cement.
    Gray GB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 7920406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured glass ionomer cements bonded to resin composites.
    Farah CS; Orton VG; Collard SM
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9612981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall.
    Azevedo LM; Casas-Apayco LC; Villavicencio Espinoza CA; Wang L; Navarro MF; Atta MT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 26221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of intermediary resins when bonding glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement to composite resin.
    Woolford MJ; Grieve AR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 May; 20(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 8496731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strength of a light-cured and two auto-cured glass ionomer liners.
    Holtan JR; Nystrom GP; Olin PS; Rudney J; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 1990 Oct; 18(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 2150073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives.
    Naoum SJ; Mutzelburg PR; Shumack TG; Thode D; Martin FE; Ellakwa AE
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 25476699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.
    Sabatini C; Patel M; D'Silva E
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.