These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8473608)

  • 1. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Mar; 93(3):1547-52. PubMed ID: 8473608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2872-80. PubMed ID: 1629480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1307-14. PubMed ID: 8408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice.
    Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1295-300. PubMed ID: 8408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2670-80. PubMed ID: 8207140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.
    Grose JH; Mamo SK; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 19633565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.
    Calandruccio L; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):860-9. PubMed ID: 20707455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition.
    Boothroyd A; Mulhearn B; Gong J; Ostroff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1807-18. PubMed ID: 8817914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are the perceptual effects of spectral smearing influenced by speaker gender?
    Kishon-Rabin L; Patael S; Menahemi M; Amir N
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):41-55. PubMed ID: 15485129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.