BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8473619)

  • 1. A comparison of N1 of the whole nerve action potential and wave i of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in Mongolian gerbil.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF; Smith RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2069-76. PubMed ID: 8473619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The brain-stem auditory-evoked response in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to clicks and frequency-modulated sweeps.
    Burkard R; Moss CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):801-10. PubMed ID: 7930082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to maximum length sequences.
    Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 8201109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    Møller AR; Jho HD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(3):142-63. PubMed ID: 1953444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2222-34. PubMed ID: 2269738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional and cross-correlation brain-stem auditory evoked responses in the white leghorn chick: rate manipulations.
    Burkard R; Jones S; Jones T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2136-44. PubMed ID: 8201110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):795-803. PubMed ID: 7130538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.
    Shipley C; Buchwald JS; Norman R; Guthrie D
    Brain Res; 1980 Jan; 182(2):313-26. PubMed ID: 7357388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of noiseburst rise time and level on the gerbil brainstem auditory evoked response.
    Burkard R
    Audiology; 1991; 30(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 2059169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal correspondence of intracranial, cochlear and scalp-recorded human auditory nerve action potentials.
    Pratt H; Martin WH; Schwegler JW; Rosenwasser RH; Rosenberg SI; Flamm ES
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 1382954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses.
    Ball LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):107-30. PubMed ID: 7187432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the VIIIth nerve compound action potential evoked by low-intensity tone pips in the Mongolian gerbil.
    Huang JM; Berlin CI; Cullen JK; Wickremasinghe AR
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):14-8. PubMed ID: 8575989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones.
    Dolphin WF; Mountain DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3215-26. PubMed ID: 8300956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. II. Response latencies.
    Boettcher FA; Mills JH; Norton BL; Schmiedt RA
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):146-56. PubMed ID: 8113133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. I. Peak latencies.
    Burkard R; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):978-90. PubMed ID: 8759951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of sympathetic stimulation on the round window compound action potential in the rat.
    Lee AH; Møller AR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 2865241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive chronic recording of auditory nerve potentials.
    Wiederhold ML; Martinez SA; Paull DM; Pierson MG; DeFries HO
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1978; 87(1 Pt 2 Suppl 45):1-11. PubMed ID: 414647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.