These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8473842)

  • 1. Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres.
    Pashler H; O'Brien S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):315-30. PubMed ID: 8473842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):826-42. PubMed ID: 2148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):795-810. PubMed ID: 15462621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
    Hein G; Schubert T
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 17563177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.
    Risko EF; Blais C; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18665744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is interhemispheric communication disturbed when the two hemispheres perform on separate tasks?
    Bergert S; Windmann S; Güntürkün O
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1457-67. PubMed ID: 16378627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the hemispheres watch each other? Evidence for a between-hemispheres performance monitoring.
    Hochman EY; Eviatar Z
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Nov; 20(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 17100511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task.
    Morimoto HM; Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2006-14. PubMed ID: 18416674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resolving dual-task interference: an fMRI study.
    Jiang Y
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):748-54. PubMed ID: 15193603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.