173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8474127)
1. Screening mammography: the other side of the coin.
Lazaro EJ; Spillert CR; Munoz E; Salzer-Pagan J
J Natl Med Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):165. PubMed ID: 8474127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic screening: does it work?
Handler S
Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making.
Ernster VL
Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Modalities of reading of detection mammographies of the programme in the Bouches-du-Rhône. Results and costs 1990-1995].
Séradour B; Wait S; Jacquemier J; Dubuc M; Piana L
J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 78(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 9091620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on "Mammography screening: prospects and opportunity costs".
Mettlin C
Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):251-5; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is screening mammography routinely indicated for women between 40 and 50 years of age? An affirmative view.
Dodd GD
J Fam Pract; 1988 Sep; 27(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 3138382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Excellent results of mammography screening. Still balancing between cost-benefit analysis].
Andersson I
Lakartidningen; 1998 Apr; 95(18):2042-5, 2048-50. PubMed ID: 9621585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Psychological advantages and disadvantages of mammography screenings].
Absetz P; Aro AR
Duodecim; 2003; 119(22):2138-44. PubMed ID: 14702798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mass screening of breast cancer: response and justification].
Bartsch P; Gordenne W
Rev Med Liege; 1998 Apr; 53(4):214-5. PubMed ID: 9641017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness.
Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 8259408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammoscam.
Randal J
N C Med J; 1993 May; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The limits of screening for breast cancer have some advantages].
Espié M
Presse Med; 2003 Jan; 32(3):119. PubMed ID: 12610383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
Spratt JS; Gaines BM; Aaron WS; Cerrito P
J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
Ellis RL
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer screening.
Elwood M
N Z Med J; 1995 Sep; 108(1007):369-70. PubMed ID: 7566779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammography screening and indeterminate core biopsy diagnoses.
Makretsov NA; Carter BA; Hayes MM
Maturitas; 2012 Nov; 73(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 22902241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mammographic screening for breast cancer--a cost-benefit analysis].
Erichsen GG
Nord Med; 1990; 105(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 2106129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
