These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8474846)
1. The role of depth stratification in the solution of the aperture problem. Bressan P; Ganis G; Vallortigara G Perception; 1993; 22(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 8474846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Drifting Edge Illusion: a stationary edge abutting an oriented drifting grating appears to move because of the 'other aperture problem'. Caplovitz GP; Paymer NA; Tse PU Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2403-14. PubMed ID: 18694778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do component motions recombine into a moving plaid percept? van den Berg AV; van de Grind WA Exp Brain Res; 1993; 93(2):312-23. PubMed ID: 8491270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cyclopean (stereoscopic) barber pole illusion. Patterson R; Bowd C; Donnelly M Vision Res; 1998 Jul; 38(14):2119-25. PubMed ID: 9797972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Barber-pole illusions and plaids: the influence of aperture shape on motion perception. Mussap AJ; Crassini B Perception; 1993; 22(10):1155-74. PubMed ID: 8047406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion. Shimojo S; Silverman GH; Nakayama K Vision Res; 1989; 29(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 2603398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prior depth information can bias motion perception. Graf EW; Adams WJ; Lages M J Vis; 2004 May; 4(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 15330710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusion and the solution to visual motion ambiguity: Looking beyond the aperture problem. van der Smagt MJ; Stoner GR J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 18318630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seeing depth coherence and transparency. Farell B; Li S J Vis; 2004 Mar; 4(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 15086311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Luminance contrast affects motion coherency in plaid patterns by acting as a depth-from-occlusion cue. Stoner GR; Albright TD Vision Res; 1998 Feb; 38(3):387-401. PubMed ID: 9536362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion contrast and motion integration. Zhang J; Yeh SL; De Valois KK Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(18):2721-32. PubMed ID: 8296468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The perceived direction of textured gratings and their motion aftereffects. Alais D; van der Smagt MJ; Verstraten FA; van de Grind WA Perception; 1995; 24(12):1383-96. PubMed ID: 8734539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereoscopic occlusion and the aperture problem for motion: a new solution. Anderson BL Vision Res; 1999 Apr; 39(7):1273-84. PubMed ID: 10343841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Occlusion and the perception of coherent motion. Vallortigara G; Bressan P Vision Res; 1991; 31(11):1967-78. PubMed ID: 1771780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The perception of moving plaids reveals two motion-processing stages. Welch L Nature; 1989 Feb; 337(6209):734-6. PubMed ID: 2918907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaction between binocular rivalry and depth in plaid patterns. Buckthought A; Wilson HR Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2543-56. PubMed ID: 17688905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial gating effects on judged motion of gratings in apertures. Power RP; Moulden B Perception; 1992; 21(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 1437464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Context and the motion aftereffect: occlusion cues in the test pattern alter perceived direction. van der Smagt M; Stoner GR Perception; 2002; 31(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 11922121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]