171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8475293)
1. Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques.
Recht MP; Kramer J; Marcelis S; Pathria MN; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Sartoris DJ; Resnick D
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 8475293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage.
Disler DG; McCauley TR
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Dec; 9(6):360-76. PubMed ID: 9894739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
