These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8475293)

  • 1. Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques.
    Recht MP; Kramer J; Marcelis S; Pathria MN; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Sartoris DJ; Resnick D
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 8475293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
    Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
    Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
    Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
    Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Dec; 9(6):360-76. PubMed ID: 9894739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
    Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.