171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8475293)
21. Short echo time projection reconstruction MR imaging of cartilage: comparison with fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS and magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging.
Brossmann J; Frank LR; Pauly JM; Boutin RD; Pedowitz RA; Haghighi P; Resnick D
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 9114112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage.
Disler DG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1117-23. PubMed ID: 9308475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Kurz B; Schaefer PJ; Fuerst M; Hedderich J; Graessner J; Schuenke M; Heller H
Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18038353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison of different MRT techniques in the diagnosis of degenerative cartilage diseases. In vitro study of 50 joint specimens of the knee at T1.5].
Bachmann G; Heinrichs C; Jürgensen I; Rominger M; Scheiter A; Rau WS
Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 9198516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of IDEAL-SPGR volume sequence to standard MR sequences in the detection and grading of cartilage lesions.
Blankenbaker DG; Ullrick SR; Kijowski R; Davis KW; De Smet AA; Shinki K; Muñoz del Rio A; Keene JS
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 21900621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Munoz Del Rio A; Baer GS; Graf BK
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):503-13. PubMed ID: 23297335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MR in the study of knee cartilage pathologies: influence of location and grade on the effectiveness of the method.
Macarini L; Murrone M; Marini S; Mariano M; Zaccheo N; Moretti B
Radiol Med; 2003 Apr; 105(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 12835623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions.
Knuesel PR; Pfirrmann CW; Noetzli HP; Dora C; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Kuehn B; Schmid MR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15547220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Articular cartilage of the knee: evaluation with fluctuating equilibrium MR imaging--initial experience in healthy volunteers.
Gold GE; Hargreaves BA; Vasanawala SS; Webb JD; Shimakawa AS; Brittain JH; Beaulieu CF
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):712-8. PubMed ID: 16436826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of cartilage lesions with fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
Brossmann J; Frank L; Resnick D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):910-1. PubMed ID: 9275924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of patellar cartilage. Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers.
Rand T; Brossmann J; Pedowitz R; Ahn JM; Haghigi P; Resnick D
Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):492-7. PubMed ID: 11016774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression.
Sonin AH; Pensy RA; Mulligan ME; Hatem S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12388492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M
Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of cartilage-dedicated sequences at ultra-high-field MRI: comparison of imaging performance and diagnostic confidence between 3.0 and 7.0 T with respect to osteoarthritis-induced changes at the knee joint.
Stahl R; Krug R; Kelley DA; Zuo J; Ma CB; Majumdar S; Link TM
Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Aug; 38(8):771-83. PubMed ID: 19294379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-point Dixon chemical-shift imaging for evaluating articular cartilage defects in the knee joint on a low-field-strength open magnet.
Bredella MA; Losasso C; Moelleken SC; Huegli RW; Genant HK; Tirman PF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1371-5. PubMed ID: 11717086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Magnetic resonance study of patellofemoral cartilage with a fat-suppressed T1-3D gradient-echo sequence: a comparison with other acquisition technics at medium field strength].
Cardone G; Minio Paluello GB; Lo Presti G; Gagliardo O; Gallucci M; Castrucci M
Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9446117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.
Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of articular cartilage: three-dimensional T1 mapping with variable flip angles and B1 correction.
Andreisek G; White LM; Yang Y; Robinson E; Cheng HL; Sussman MS
Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 19703855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
