These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Silicone-suppressed 3D MRI of the breast using rotating delivery of off-resonance excitation. Harms SE; Jensen RA; Meiches MD; Flamig DP; Evans WP J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 7790549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection with MR imaging of residual tumor in the breast soon after surgery. Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Farrell RS; Pruneda JM; Flamig DP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):485-8. PubMed ID: 9016232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New horizons in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Cross MJ; Harms SE; Cheek JH; Peters GN; Jones RC Am J Surg; 1993 Dec; 166(6):749-53; discussion 753-5. PubMed ID: 8273862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design. Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. Lee CH; Smith RC; Levine JA; Troiano RN; Tocino I AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 10541112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Orel SG; Schnall MD; Powell CM; Hochman MG; Solin LJ; Fowble BL; Torosian MH; Rosato EF Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 7784554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions. Kristoffersen Wiberg M; Aspelin P; Perbeck L; Boné B Acta Radiol; 2002 May; 43(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12100324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions. Boné B; Péntek Z; Perbeck L; Veress B Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human female breast. Current status and pathologic correlations. Powell DE; Stelling CB Pathol Annu; 1988; 23 Pt 1():159-94. PubMed ID: 2838793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast diseases]. Boné BK; Szabó B; Palkó A; Aspelin P Orv Hetil; 2001 Sep; 142(39):2123-31. PubMed ID: 11723831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR imaging of the breast: current status and future potential. Harms SE; Flamig DP; Evans WP; Harries SA; Brown S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1039-47. PubMed ID: 7976873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Westerhof JP; Fischer U; Moritz JD; Oestmann JW Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 9609890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast. Gökalp G; Topal U Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]