143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8475301)
1. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Oestmann JW; Galanski M
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
Prokop M; Galanski M; Oestmann JW; von Falkenhausen U; Rosenthal H; Reimer P; Nischelsky J; Reichelt S
Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.
Schaefer CM; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Wiesmann W; Haubitz B; Meschede A; Reichelt S; Schirg E; Stender HS; Galanski M
Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 1609106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in film-screen chest radiographs in regard to detection of simulated pulmonary nodules: comparison between film-screen combination and FCR].
Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Matsumoto T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1237-44. PubMed ID: 7610026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lung nodule conspicuity using unsharp mask filters with storage-phosphor-based computed radiography.
Li F; Sone S; Kiyono K
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 9059410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
Müller RD; Voss M; Hirche H; Buddenbrock B; John V; Bosch E
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of small peripheral lung cancer by digital chest radiography. Performance of unprocessed versus unsharp mask-processed images.
Yang ZG; Sone S; Li F; Takashima S; Maruyama Y; Hasegawa M; Hanamura K; Asakura K
Acta Radiol; 1999 Sep; 40(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 10485239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B
Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
Schaefer CM; Greene R; Llewellyn HJ; Mrose HE; Pile-Spellman EA; Rubens JR; Lindemann SR
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chest radiographs obtained with shaped filters: evaluation by observer performance tests.
Kelsey CA; Lane RG; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Rosenberg RD; Williams AG; Garcia JF; Feldman BS; Boardman RE
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 3704147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
