108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8475431)
1. Optoelectronic evaluation of trunk deformity in scoliosis.
Dawson EG; Kropf MA; Purcell G; Kabo JM; Kanim LE; Burt C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 8475431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II: relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes.
Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1202-5. PubMed ID: 15897836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health-related quality of life questionnaire responses.
Asher M; Lai SM; Burton D; Manna B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 15082985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hump height in idiopathic scoliosis measured using a humpmeter in growing subjects: relationship between the hump height and the Cobb angle and the effect of age on the hump height.
Ferraro C; Venturin A; Ferraro M; Fabris Monterumici D; Masiero S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 53(3):377-389. PubMed ID: 27824236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Polyzois BD; Samelis P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():38-43. PubMed ID: 15456003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lateral spinal profile in school-screening referrals with and without late onset idiopathic scoliosis 10 degrees-20 degrees.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Samelis P; Maziotou C; Kandris K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():25-31. PubMed ID: 15457689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between Quantec measurement and Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Thometz JG; Lamdan R; Liu XC; Lyon R
J Pediatr Orthop; 2000; 20(4):512-6. PubMed ID: 10912610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature.
He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of Cobb angle in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis.
Sapkas G; Papagelopoulos PJ; Kateros K; Koundis GL; Boscainos PJ; Koukou UI; Katonis P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):32-9. PubMed ID: 12782857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A new approach for evaluation of the rotational deformity in scoliosis. Part I: The development of an apparatus measuring truncal cross-sections and quantitative rotational indices of scoliosis].
Mori Y
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Nov; 56(11):1617-32. PubMed ID: 7161549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of a quantitative clinical measurement tool of trunk posture in idiopathic scoliosis.
Fortin C; Feldman DE; Cheriet F; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E988-94. PubMed ID: 20700086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stature and growth compensation for spinal curvature.
Stokes IA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():48-51. PubMed ID: 18809998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Armstrong JG; Moreland MS
J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 3334733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of spinal deformity in scoliosis from torso surface cross sections.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1583-91. PubMed ID: 11462091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Cobb angle progression a good indicator in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
Delorme S; Labelle H; Aubin CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(6):E145-51. PubMed ID: 11884919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression.
Parent EC; Damaraju S; Hill DL; Lou E; Smetaniuk D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 158():78-82. PubMed ID: 20543404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis.
Deviren V; Berven S; Kleinstueck F; Antinnes J; Smith JA; Hu SS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):2346-9. PubMed ID: 12438982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between gibbosity and Cobb angle during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the SpineCor brace.
Griffet J; Leroux MA; Badeaux J; Coillard C; Zabjek KF; Rivard CH
Eur Spine J; 2000 Dec; 9(6):516-22. PubMed ID: 11189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
