These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8476006)

  • 1. Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better.
    Jamison PL; Ward RE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Apr; 90(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 8476006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: implications and suggestions for clinical applications.
    Ward RE; Jamison PL
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1991; 11(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 1761648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random errors in anthropometry.
    Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Tsuzuki K; Yokoi T
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1996 Dec; 25(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 9735595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introduction of a three-dimensional anthropometry of the viscerocranium. Part I: measurement of craniofacial development and establishment of standard values and growth functions.
    Landes CA; Bitsakis J; Diehl T; Bitter K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 30(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 12064879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of clinical measurements used in the determination of facial indices.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 36(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 18358735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver errors in anthropometry.
    Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Tsuzuki K; Yokoi T
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1999 Dec; 28(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 11957319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anthropometry in health assessment: the importance of measurement error.
    Ulijaszek SJ; Lourie JA
    Coll Antropol; 1997 Dec; 21(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 9439059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple observers, humidity, and choice of precision statistics: factors influencing craniometric data quality.
    Utermohle CJ; Zegura SL; Heathcote GM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 May; 61(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6869516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing indirect methods of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurement.
    Kemper CJ; Schwerdtfeger A
    Am J Hum Biol; 2009; 21(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 18988284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How reproducibly can human ear ossicles be measured? A study of inter-observer error.
    Flohr S; Leckelt J; Kierdorf U; Kierdorf H
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2010 Dec; 293(12):2094-106. PubMed ID: 21046668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for measurement error: a critical but often overlooked process.
    Harris EF; Smith RN
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Dec; 54 Suppl 1():S107-17. PubMed ID: 18674753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of three length measurement techniques in term infants.
    Johnson TS; Engstrom JL; Haney SL; Mulcrone SL
    Pediatr Nurs; 1999; 25(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10335245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harmonization process and reliability assessment of anthropometric measurements in a multicenter study in adolescents.
    Nagy E; Vicente-Rodriguez G; Manios Y; Béghin L; Iliescu C; Censi L; Dietrich S; Ortega FB; De Vriendt T; Plada M; Moreno LA; Molnar D;
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Nov; 32 Suppl 5():S58-65. PubMed ID: 19011655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
    Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
    Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proportional growth of craniofacial regions.
    Trenouth MJ; Joshi M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 16570131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Describing normal variations of head and face by using standard measurement and craniofacial variability index (CVI) in seven-year-old normal children.
    Ozdemir MB; Ilgaz A; Dilek A; Ayten H; Esat A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 17538305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraobserver reliability of 4 physiologic movements of the shoulder in subjects with and without symptoms.
    Valentine RE; Lewis JS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 87(9):1242-9. PubMed ID: 16935062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications.
    von Cramon-Taubadel N; Frazier BC; Lahr MM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2007 Sep; 134(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 17503448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.