These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8476006)

  • 41. [Symmetry of the human midface].
    Koch A; Wiese KG; Rasse M
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1993 Dec; 79(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 8128759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.
    Lou L; Lagravere MO; Compton S; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17709072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():156-163. PubMed ID: 29055251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. New methods for quantitative and qualitative facial studies: an overview.
    Thomas IT; Hintz RJ; Frias JL
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1989; 9(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 2677039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Error measurement in craniometrics: The comparative performance of four popular assessment methods using 2000 simulated cranial length datasets (g-op).
    Fancourt HSM; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():162-171. PubMed ID: 29501053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Precision of measurement as a component of human variation.
    Goto R; Mascie-Taylor CG
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2007 Mar; 26(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 17435374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The percentage reliability of Angle ANB.
    Chandra KG
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1987 Jun; 1(2):55-60, 71. PubMed ID: 3269789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability.
    Bragança S; Arezes P; Carvalho M; Ashdown SP; Castellucci I; Leão C
    Work; 2018; 59(3):325-339. PubMed ID: 29630575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The assessment and meaning of intraobserver error in population studies based on discontinuous cranial traits.
    Molto JE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1979 Sep; 51(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 394603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Recent developments of sex determination using various skeletal sections].
    Leopold D; Vollmüller J; Novotny V
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1990; 48():31-6. PubMed ID: 2241808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Evaluation of the reliability of anthropometric measures].
    Pareja G; Rivera J; Habicht JP; Castro H
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 1989 Sep; 39(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 2490880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The reliability of height measurement (the Wessex Growth Study).
    Voss LD; Bailey BJ; Cumming K; Wilkin TJ; Betts PR
    Arch Dis Child; 1990 Dec; 65(12):1340-4. PubMed ID: 2270942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Humidity as a source of measurement error in osteometrics.
    Albrecht GH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 Apr; 60(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 6846520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reliability of length measurements in full-term neonates.
    Johnson TS; Engstrom JL; Warda JA; Kabat M; Peters B
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1998; 27(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 9620819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Brief communication: Effect of size biases in the coefficient of variation on assessing intraspecific variability in the prosimian skeleton.
    Fulwood EL; Kramer A
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Sep; 152(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 23900852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reliability of anthropometric methods and replicate measurements.
    Himes JH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 May; 79(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 2750880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cephalometric reliability. A full ANOVA model for the estimation of true and error variance.
    Buschang PH; Tanguay R; Demirjian A
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Apr; 57(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 3473952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation.
    Perez SI; Bernal V; Gonzalez PN
    J Anat; 2006 Jun; 208(6):769-84. PubMed ID: 16761977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A literature review of anthropometric studies of school students for ergonomics purposes: Are accuracy, precision and reliability being considered?
    Bravo G; Bragança S; Arezes PM; Molenbroek JFM; Castellucci HI
    Work; 2018; 60(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29843294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An approach to assessing the reliability of anthropometrics in elderly patients.
    Sullivan DH; Patch GA; Baden AL; Lipschitz DA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1989 Jul; 37(7):607-13. PubMed ID: 2738279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.