These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8476193)

  • 1. The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication.
    Lee JR; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Mar; 75(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 8476193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Wyllie JH; Edwards DA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 4037629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis: surgical management using fundoplication.
    Purkiss SF; Argano VA; Kuo J; Lewis CT
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 1389267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Hill AD; Walsh TN; Bolger CM; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jan; 81(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 8313128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Our experience on the use of the antireflux prosthesis by the Angelchik method (personal contribution of 26 cases)].
    Puchetti V
    Chir Ital; 1989; 41(2-3):145-59. PubMed ID: 2638219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiology of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux.
    Burhenne LJ; Fratkin LB; Flak B; Burhenne HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 6607635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Silicone anti-reflux prosthesis--an artificial fundoplication?].
    Weiser HF; Hölscher AH; Isemer FE; Siewert JR
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1982; 357(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 7154800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Gastro-esophageal reflux. Treatment with an inert prosthesis, the Angelchik collar].
    Berard P
    Presse Med; 1984 Mar; 13(9):559-61. PubMed ID: 6230651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Gear MW; Gillison EW; Dowling BL
    Br J Surg; 1984 Sep; 71(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 6383512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis.
    Gourley GR; Pellett JR; Li BU; Adkins WN
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1986 Jan; 5(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 2935608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
    Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM
    World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
    Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW
    Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oesophageal transit of marshmallow after the Angelchik procedure.
    Robertson CS; Smart H; Amar SS; Morris DL
    Br J Surg; 1989 Mar; 76(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 2720319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angelchik anti-reflux device: radiographic appearance of complications.
    Curtis DJ; Benjamin SB; Kerr R; Castell DO
    Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 6424173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The frequency of true short oesophagus in type II-IV hiatal hernia.
    Lugaresi M; Mattioli S; Aramini B; D'Ovidio F; Di Simone MP; Perrone O
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Feb; 43(2):e30-6. PubMed ID: 23186837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.