These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 84787)

  • 1. On the feedback regulation of humoral immune response. I. Evidence for 'B suppressor cells'.
    Stockinger B; Botzenhardt U; Lemmel EM
    Immunology; 1979 Jan; 36(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 84787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lymphoid cell dependence of eosinophil response to antigen. VI. The effect of selective removal of T or B lymphocytes on the capacity of primed spleen cells to adoptively transferred immunity to tetanus toxoid.
    Ponzio NM; Speirs RS
    Immunology; 1975 Feb; 28(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 1079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. T cell-dependent helper and suppressive influences in an adoptive IgG antibody response.
    Arrenbrecht S; Mitchell GF
    Immunology; 1975 Mar; 28(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 1092611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of certain mechanisms of antigen-specific suppression of the immune response].
    Pisarev VM; Stukalov SV
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1981 Aug; 92(8):61-3. PubMed ID: 6170364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. B lymphocyte regulation of the immune system. I. In vivo biologic activity of the novel lymphokine, B cell-derived enhancing factor (BEF).
    del Guercio P; del Guercio MF; Katz DH
    J Immunol; 1985 Feb; 134(2):996-1002. PubMed ID: 3871223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epitope-specific antibody feedback regulation of the humoral immune response against sheep erythrocytes in vitro: specific effects of anti-antigen antibody vs nonspecific T cell activities.
    Zubler RH
    J Immunol; 1981 Feb; 126(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 6161182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clonal anergy of memory B cells in epitope-specific regulation.
    Galelli A; Charlot B
    J Immunol; 1990 Oct; 145(8):2397-405. PubMed ID: 1698854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parenteral immunization causes antigen-specific cell-mediated suppression of an intestinal IgA response.
    Koster FT; Pierce NF
    J Immunol; 1983 Jul; 131(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 6190901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of antibody feedback inhibition in the regulation of the secondary antibody response after high and low dose priming.
    Grantham WG; Fitch FW
    J Immunol; 1975 Jan; 114(1 Pt 2):394-8. PubMed ID: 1090658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of t lymphocytes in the humoral immune response. II. T cell-mediated regulation of antibody avidity.
    Warren RW; Murphy S; Davie JM
    J Immunol; 1976 May; 116(5):1385-90. PubMed ID: 58032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pyran (MVE-5) reverses the inhibition of macrophage receptors for cytophilic antibody induced by soluble immune complexes.
    Rao VS; Mitchell MS
    J Biol Response Mod; 1983; 2(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 6606020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulation of primary antibody response in mice by two types of suppressor cells resistant to anti-thy-1 serum treatment.
    Hirokawa K; Hatakeyama S; Sado T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Sep; 28(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 6456846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feedback control of the secondary antibody response. I. A suppressor, suppressor-inducer mechanism from the interaction of B-memory cells with Lyt 2- T cells.
    Thomas DB; Kennedy MW
    Immunology; 1983 Oct; 50(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 6225730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of antigenic potency in vitro and immunogenicity in vivo by coupling the antigen to anti-immunoglobulin.
    Kawamura H; Berzofsky JA
    J Immunol; 1986 Jan; 136(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 3079611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies on the clonality of the response to an epitope of a protein antigen. Randomness of activation of epitope-recognizing clones and the development of clonal dominance.
    Benjamini E; Andria ML; Estin CD; Norton FL; Leung CY
    J Immunol; 1988 Jul; 141(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 2454264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential requirement for B-memory and T-memory cells in adoptive antibody formation in mouse bone marrow.
    Koch G; Benner R
    Immunology; 1982 Apr; 45(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 6978285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study of the phenomenon of specific suppression of the immune response in an adoptive transfer system].
    Pisarev VM; PevnitskiÄ­ LA
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1977 May; 83(5):571-3. PubMed ID: 301756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specific susceptibility of sensitized (memory) B cells to suppression and antigenic alteration by murine leukemia virus.
    Cerny J; Waner EB
    J Immunol; 1975 Feb; 114(2 Pt 1):571-80. PubMed ID: 164504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulation of immune responses by T cell subsets. Role of helper and suppressor T cells in the development and expression of MHC-restricted antibody responses to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT) by (responder X responder)F1 spleen cells.
    Lake JP; Kapp JA; Pierce CW
    J Immunol; 1986 Feb; 136(4):1201-9. PubMed ID: 2418108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feedback control of the secondary antibody response. II. Differences in the rate of induction of T-helper and T-suppressor memory.
    Kennedy MW; Thomas DB
    Immunology; 1983 Oct; 50(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 6225731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.