BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8479009)

  • 1. Diagnosis and treatment of psychogenic erectile dysfunction in a urological setting: outcomes of 18 consecutive patients.
    Vickers MA; De Nobrega AM; Dluhy RG
    J Urol; 1993 May; 149(5 Pt 2):1258-61. PubMed ID: 8479009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New concept parameters of RigiScan in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction: is it a useful test?
    Basar MM; Atan A; Tekdogan UY
    Int J Urol; 2001 Dec; 8(12):686-91. PubMed ID: 11851769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity (NPTR) Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Review.
    Zou Z; Lin H; Zhang Y; Wang R
    Sex Med Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(3):442-454. PubMed ID: 30612976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vacuum therapy combined with psychotherapy for management of severe erectile dysfunction.
    Segenreich E; Israilov SR; Shmueli J; Servadio C
    Eur Urol; 1995; 28(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8521894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
    Trinchieri A; Nicola M; Masini F; Mangiarotti B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Dec; 77(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 16444937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Penile erectile strength measurement band for differentiation and classification of erectile dysfunction].
    Lin ZB; Deng JH; Huang LL; Shi H; Liu JM; Ou-Yang B; Xie JX
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2018 Jun; 24(6):520-524. PubMed ID: 30173457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Maximum increase of penile circumference as a parameter for evaluation of penile erectile capacity].
    Adachi H; Satoh Y; Horita H; Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Sep; 88(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 9364844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of erectile dysfunction with continuous monitoring of penile rigidity.
    Kaneko S; Bradley WE
    J Urol; 1986 Nov; 136(5):1026-9. PubMed ID: 3773061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The treatment of erectile dysfunction: what are the objectives and the methods?].
    Bondil P; Blachère P
    Prog Urol; 1998 Feb; 8(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9533148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric differentiation of psychogenic and organic erectile disorders.
    Hatch JP; de la Peña AM; Fisher JG
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):781-3. PubMed ID: 3656533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.
    Basal S; Wambi C; Acikel C; Gupta M; Badani K
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 23186312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination between psychogenic and organic erectile dysfunction.
    Speckens AE; Hengeveld MW; Lycklama à Nijeholt GA; van Hemert AM; Hawton KE
    J Psychosom Res; 1993; 37(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 8463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective evaluation of efficacy and compliance with a multistep treatment approach for erectile dysfunction in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Gontero P; Fontana F; Zitella A; Montorsi F; Frea B
    BJU Int; 2005 Feb; 95(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 15679794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined sildenafil with vacuum erection device therapy in the management of diabetic men with erectile dysfunction after failure of first-line sildenafil monotherapy.
    Sun L; Peng FL; Yu ZL; Liu CL; Chen J
    Int J Urol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1263-7. PubMed ID: 25039272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The negative pressure device for erectile disorders: when does it fail?
    Meinhardt W; Lycklama a Nijeholt AA; Kropman RF; Zwartendijk J
    J Urol; 1993 May; 149(5 Pt 2):1285-7. PubMed ID: 8479017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of honeymoon impotence.
    Shamloul R
    J Sex Med; 2006 Mar; 3(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 16490033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring in the evaluation of impotence.
    Shvartzman P
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Sep; 39(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 8077907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Penile Low Intensity Shock Wave Treatment is Able to Shift PDE5i Nonresponders to Responders: A Double-Blind, Sham Controlled Study.
    Kitrey ND; Gruenwald I; Appel B; Shechter A; Massarwa O; Vardi Y
    J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1550-1555. PubMed ID: 26694904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective comparison of topical minoxidil to vacuum constriction device and intracorporeal papaverine injection in treatment of erectile dysfunction due to spinal cord injury.
    Chancellor MB; Rivas DA; Panzer DE; Freedman MK; Staas WE
    Urology; 1994 Mar; 43(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 8134992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence in evaluation of impotence.
    Allen RP; Engel RM; Smolev JK; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1525-9. PubMed ID: 8189562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.