These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8480049)

  • 1. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an enhanced digital film-duplication system by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Hoffmann KR; MacMahon H; Doi K; Metz CE; Yao L; Abe K
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Dec; 28(12):1134-8. PubMed ID: 8307717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier.
    Brauer GW; Fisher PD; Hanley JA; Ritchie GW
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 Feb; 2(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 2488152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Are high-intensifying film-screen combinations suitable for the detection of fine interstitial lung changes? The results of a ROC study with an anthropomorphic thorax phantom].
    Müller RD; John V; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; Blendl C; Hirche H; Ewen K; Löhr E
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 8334259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
    Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.