These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8480051)
1. [The evaluation of a digital system for the automatic analysis of the density of abdominal radiograms]. Braccini G; Bertellotti L; Boraschi P; Marrucci A; Caramella D; Salvetti O; Evangelista R; Bozzi R Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):65-9. PubMed ID: 8480051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube. Honda C; Ohara H Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology. Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors. Price BD; Esbrand CJ; Olivo A; Gibson AP; Hebden JC; Speller RD; Royle GJ Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system. Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging. Gravel P; Després P; Beaudoin G; de Guise JA Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and implementation of a compact low-dose diffraction enhanced medical imaging system. Parham C; Zhong Z; Connor DM; Chapman LD; Pisano ED Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):911-7. PubMed ID: 19375952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic background recognition and removal (ABRR) in computed radiography images. Zhang J; Huang HK IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):762-71. PubMed ID: 9533577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Controlling of the high-voltage generator in a direct radiography system]. Shen JX; Xu P; Zhou HQ; Feng HQ Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 16830803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a simulator for radiographic image optimization. Winslow M; Xu XG; Yazici B Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Jun; 78(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 15899304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of the automatic brightness controlling for x-ray imaging systems]. Huang YL; Qu T; Lu KL; Pan ZZ Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 26(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 16104315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]